tapnek said:
Not sure.
Not loli.
CodeKyuubi said:
Not quite sure. It's not particularly explicit, so probably not loli. Btw, Kuro looks petite to me.
Posted under General
tapnek said:
Not sure.
Not loli.
CodeKyuubi said:
Not quite sure. It's not particularly explicit, so probably not loli. Btw, Kuro looks petite to me.
Gollgagh said:
I mean there's a significant amount of cameltoe that you're ignoring.
Sigh. I'm not ignoring anything. I've said that the post is "not particularly explicit", not that it is safe. It is correctly rated Q and cameltoe is not the only reason for that.
I did consider their proportions and overall look, that post's level of explicitness is only one of the factors. And I'm still not sure.
loli rating:q aren't mutually exclusive though
My post #2810512 has a misused loli tag. How should I remove it?
Hotaru_1 said:
My post #2810512 has a misused loli tag. How should I remove it?
Done.
post #2810512 again. Really sorry. I had no idea what "Revert to" does.
This would be safe if she wasn't prepubescent looking but she is.
tapnek said:
This would be safe if she wasn't prepubescent looking but she is.
Not loli, it's mainly due to the perspective. It's still rating:q though since it's "in the middle of disrobing".
Leaning towards loli.
post #2838703 (Rating E)
Should be loli..I suppose
NOT loli
Unsure since the shirt hides some details.
tapnek said:
Unsure since the shirt hides some details.
I uploaded the child, but I'd say no. I feel based on assumed proportions based on the positioning of the ass to shoulders, the torso (and as a result the body as a whole) is long and developed enough to be out of loli range.
Unsure if this is enough for it to be loli/questionable.
Unbreakable said:
Unsure if this is enough for it to be loli/questionable.
loli