Upload Feedback Thread - post here if your uploads keep getting deleted

Marqant said:

post #2658797
post #2660016
post #2660020

It has been reviewed by 1 moderator. 1 did not like the post enough to approve it.

Weird proportions in all of them. The first one has Flannery's torso being super long compared to her arms and legs. The second one combines this with weird perspective by her having short arms and a torso that looks like it doesn't connect to the pelvis correctly. And the third one has the pelvis-torso connection problem but with her looking like she has ass implants.

tapnek said:

Weird proportions in all of them. The first one has Flannery's torso being super long compared to her arms and legs. The second one combines this with weird perspective by her having short arms and a torso that looks like it doesn't connect to the pelvis correctly. And the third one has the pelvis-torso connection problem but with her looking like she has ass implants.

I'm fine with your explanations. If you look closely, the bodies seem strange. I cannot agree with No. 2, though. The torso may be a bit too long but the rest looks fine. The arm is a matter of perspective because you look from below. The good coloring and the art style should be considered, just my opinion.

Edit: I have looked at No. 3 again and see a problem in your opinion. If you look closely, the upper body is bent over, her ass resting on the guys groin. Please have a look at the wrinkles of her shirt. The thigh ends where the shirt ends. Again, just my opinion.

post #2828523
post #2828532

post #2812591
post #2543033
post #2058735
post #2041433
post #1945671

Dimension252525 said:

I have a question about these publications

Post #2823405
Post #2823406
Post #2823407

Although, the censored version was approved, however the uncensored ones were eliminated.

Why were publications was eliminated? I mean, it's the complete version.

Just in case nobody read this ...

post #2832565

post #2834040 (approved)
post #2834037 (deleted) Edit: approved

The second post is the same artwork as the first post but with higher resolution and no speech bubbles.

If you deem these posts have any artistic problem, the first post should be deleted as well. If not, then the second post should be approved.

post #2834369 (deleted)
post #2833383 (approved)

Despite being an alternate color version with a few other minor edits, the above image got deleted while the parent image was fine. Why was that? Its not as if the image is of any less quality than its approved parent.

post #2745037 (approved)
post #2745046 (approved)
post #2745063 (approved)
post #2745066
post #2745073 (approved)
post #2745074 (approved)

post #2843984
post #2843985
I am surprised that these two don't get approved, compared to the next two. I mean... Actually I kinda thought that the next two have higher chance not to get approved.(by higher, I mean, it seems so when comparing to the previous two that I mention. It doesn't mean I wanna try my luck by posting things with inferior quality)

post #2844581 (Approved)
post #2844583 (Approved)

Erm...

post #2516092
post #2516096

kudus said:

post #2516092 - Horrible anatomy/proportions. The torso is way too short or everything else is too large. She isn’t even hunched over.
post #2516096 - Bad proportions/perspective. Probably an attempt at foreshortening, but too extreme for the chosen perspective, so it just looks bad.

Makes me wonder how all that similar subpar stuff got approved. I’d stay away from that artist.

This thread is becoming an other deletion appeal thread. Can no one come with some constructive criticism?

ion288 said:

This thread is becoming an other deletion appeal thread. Can no one come with some constructive criticism?

Well, this topic also works as an Appeal topic even if it's not the first intention.
Apparantly, there is no need to give criticism then.

ion288 said:

This thread is becoming an other deletion appeal thread. Can no one come with some constructive criticism?

It's also because more than half the people in this thread do use it just like the Deletion Appeal one, but I think it's pretty clear that this thread is not for appealing posts. I'll also put here something relevant to your question here, since it's not mandatory to give criticism.

Rules for those requesting feedback:
#1 - You are not guaranteed feedback. It is entirely voluntary to give it.

ion288 said:

This thread is becoming an other deletion appeal thread. Can no one come with some constructive criticism?

Didn’t I give feedback just two minutes before your post? Or was it not “constructive” enough and you want me to add “Try to post images that don’t have these issues”? :-/

Or do you mean the unanswered requests before the one I answered? I often find it hard to describe the issues, especially if the images are pretty borderline. Anything not glaringly obvious also tends to be brushed aside by the uploader (“I don’t see the issue”) and I don’t feel like wasting my time on that. No idea what reasons the other sporadic responders in this thread have to not answer.

kittey said:

Didn’t I give feedback just two minutes before your post? Or was it not “constructive” enough and you want me to add “Try to post images that don’t have these issues”? :-/

Sorry, I did not see your post after posting mine or I would have made an edit.

I think it is important to give feedback even on obvious errors in order to teach new uploaders what to avoid. But Im a mere member and it might be inappropriate for me to give criticism. Should I?

ion288 said:

Sorry, I did not see your post after posting mine or I would have made an edit.

I think it is important to give feedback even on obvious errors in order to teach new uploaders what to avoid. But Im a mere member and it might be inappropriate for me to give criticism. Should I?

Everyone is free to give criticism.
But I really don't see any point to critisize here.
But since most post get pretty fast undeleted, there is pretty much no room to give criticism lately. But I also think that 5 posts are just too much to give criticism. There the uploader needs to do a first step, because it seems that it's just posted here, but with no thought put into it..

ion288 said:

I think it is important to give feedback even on obvious errors in order to teach new uploaders what to avoid. But Im a mere member and it might be inappropriate for me to give criticism. Should I?

It’s not inappropriate at all. More users giving helpful feedback is always a good thing. If you’ve lurked enough and think that you have a feel for what approvers don’t like and what usually isn’t an issue and you think you can describe it, go right ahead. Focus on the main problems and ignore the smaller issues unless it’s a whole bunch of small issues all over.

post #2848068

Is it mostly the case of "alright but not good enough," or is there anything in particular?