Should this get the bad anatomy tag? Or is that chair really separating her breasts that awkwardly?

Ryouji said:
Should this get the bad anatomy tag? Or is that chair really separating her breasts that awkwardly?

No take a better look at the image. Her breast is really not being separated. Try using yours eyes more and you can see it clearly

How does this count towards futa? I don't see a penith....

Ted_Ninja said:
How does this count towards futa? I don't see a penith....

you'll see soon enough

Ted_Ninja said:

How does this count towards futa? I don't see a penith....

There's not enough of anything visible in the image to tag this futanari. The rule is to tag what you see.

Re-added the tag, seeing as there is a visible bulge in those panties that would not be visible at that angle if she wasn't packing a package.

sgcdonmai said:

Re-added the tag, seeing as there is a visible bulge in those panties that would not be visible at that angle if she wasn't packing a package.

What are you talking about? Her crotch isn't visible at all.

StalkingPanda said:

What are you talking about? Her crotch isn't visible at all.

And yet there is a visible bulge at the top of the front side of her panties. Visible despite the angle being so oblique, with her posture mostly obscuring that region. That's an undeniable presence right there. The tag should stay.

sgcdonmai said:

And yet there is a visible bulge at the top of the front side of her panties. Visible despite the angle being so oblique, with her posture mostly obscuring that region. That's an undeniable presence right there. The tag should stay.

pretty sure that's tummy fat. either that or bad perspective.