Added delta force (video game) tag to this and the child post since these two specific skins are being added to DF as a collab.
Except the average person isn't going to look at this and immediately think of Delta Force. CoD had a Gundam collab with RX-78, Char Zaku and Aerial as skins, but we don't add call_of_duty to every post of those three.
"Tag what you see, not what you know". Unless it's a direct reference, we don't add the tag.
Except the average person isn't going to look at this and immediately think of Delta Force. CoD had a Gundam collab with RX-78, Char Zaku and Aerial as skins, but we don't add call_of_duty to every post of those three.
"Tag what you see, not what you know". Unless it's a direct reference, we don't add the tag.
The commentary (triangle and diamond) is exactly what the official Delta Force account posted on Chinese social media when teasing the collab, so I'd assume it's indeed an intentional reference. Does that count?
The commentary (triangle and diamond) is exactly what the official Delta Force account posted on Chinese social media when teasing the collab, so I'd assume it's indeed an intentional reference. Does that count?
Rules of Thumb is "the visual and factual elements in the image" as artist's commentary can sometimes be a reference or just something entirely different that has nothing to do with the image itself.
Rules of Thumb is "the visual and factual elements in the image" as artist's commentary can sometimes be a reference or just something entirely different that has nothing to do with the image itself.
"Sometimes the commentary is wrong" does not mean the commentary should always be ignored. We would actually tag an image like this based on the commentary, if the commentary is directly referencing the collab. That means the art is directly referencing the collab.
