Oh fuck, I spelled "quality" wrong. =/

Mr_GT said:
Oh fuck, I spelled "quality" wrong. =/

Ha Ha Ha! You're always a laugh Meiling. Probably a strange day for you.

Anavrin said:
I don't really see what's wrong with this...

That's probably because you've gotten accustomed to bad anime proportions. If you were a [good] art student( or happened to see a real nude human before) you would be able to pick out the errors in a heartbeat, which include but are not limited to:

- clavicles
- distance between breasts and clavicles
- stomach
- genitalia
- pubic hair
- anus
- butt cheeks
- hands
- legs
- ankles
- feet
- fat rolls

Objectively speaking, this picture is a real mess. And if you dare say "Well, it's just the artist's intentional art style." then myself and the rest of the intelligent community here at the 'Dan will smack you upside your spiky head.

GordonFreeman said:
That's probably because you've gotten accustomed to bad anime proportions. If you were a [good] art student( or happened to see a real nude human before) you would be able to pick out the errors in a heartbeat, which include but are not limited to:

- clavicles
- distance between breasts and clavicles
- stomach
- genitalia
- pubic hair
- anus
- butt cheeks
- hands
- legs
- ankles
- feet
- fat rolls

Objectively speaking, this picture is a real mess. And if you dare say "Well, it's just the artist's intentional art style." then myself and the rest of the intelligent community here at the 'Dan will smack you upside your spiky head.

You guys must be pretty anal about that stuff, unless you're trying to be sarcastic here.

RawrImAMonster said:
You guys must be pretty anal about that stuff, unless you're trying to be sarcastic here.

If you consider disliking art that is chock full of errors being anal, then yes, some of us are.

And apparently someone cannot criticize an image of questionable quality without someone getting on their ass and somehow justifying it by saying there's worse stuff in here.