There’s a massive swathe of pictures that clearly show him but he remains untagged (I guess the pic needs to show his driver’s license?) though theres characters where the image shows MAYBE a fingernail but apparently it’s really them despite no information saying so from the source.
I’ve long assumed this is some sort of in-joke on Danbooru.
There’s a massive swathe of pictures that clearly show him but he remains untagged (I guess the pic needs to show his driver’s license?) though theres characters where the image shows MAYBE a fingernail but apparently it’s really them despite no information saying so from the source.
I’ve long assumed this is some sort of in-joke on Danbooru.
At this point Danbooru became some sort of joke by itself for me, I only stroll around when I'm looking for something and bump into atrocities (I'm not saying this is one of them).
At this point Danbooru became some sort of joke by itself for me, I only stroll around when I'm looking for something and bump into atrocities (I'm not saying this is one of them).
Better question: Why are we applying morality to art?
CGrascal said:
What's morality and why should it be measured based off of your definition of it?
You're trying to reach the "nobody can define what's right or wrong because it depends on the person" huh? Surprisingly that's too soft and vague as an answer since it leaves an abysmal space to fill that can't be filled. What's right or wrong is a basic question that anyone could answer, but each individual has their own "freedom" that automatically ends when it defies someone else's, it's an ambiguously twisted debate that always ends where it started, even though there's basics that people still defy or question to their own benefit. Although I do agree that it's pointless to even think about all this on a site such as a -booru page, twitter, etc.
Better question: Why are we applying morality to art?
Mainly because anything in existence can have morality applied, it's what said morality is used for, an endless void of possibilities that makes us question why do we do what we think it's ok and what's not. If freedom is given to anyone thinking that it's harmless no matter the circumstances we might go a dubious path, and the most insane comparison it's how people take something small to something gigantic, such as a famous german painter with funny moustache. Art it's in fact only art when it's appreciated and given meaning, affection towards one's creation and most importantly room to have different opinions, you can take a look at paintings that are nothing but random blocks shattered which have worth of millions and countless opinions
For something to be a fact it has to be true regardless of who says it, regardless of bias. What you said - only you and maybe ten other yahoos think so.
For something to be a fact it has to be true regardless of who says it, regardless of bias. What you said - only you and maybe ten other yahoos think so.
You can search about it, maybe you'll see more zeros behind that number you're mocking.
Somehow I doubt me being off by a magnitude or two is gonna make your bullshit any less bullshit.
Considering society has reached a point where there's even "debates" and "respecting other's opinion" when the point at hand is something that shouldn't be considered normal it's disappointing by itself. There's real people, not trolls, that would argue about furry, lolicon, or even worse kinds and simply get over that with "if you don't like it just ignore it" or "You may disagree with others but don't disrespect them" when the matter at hand it's already something that would be wrong in every aspect, whether it's words, art or hopefully not, actions. The "it's just a drawing" it doesn't have age doesn't remove the fact that said artist most likely has a thing for the matter he/she is representing, it's not this post's case thankfully
Leave a comment