I can't see any reason to tag this as 2boys. Bridget clearly looks female in this, and not in the otoko no ko manner. The breasts and thighs give it away. The only hint about Bridget being a boy is in the commentary (which was previously untranslated), and it sounds more like the assistant is referring to canon Bridget rather than the artist's interpretation in the image. And if I understand correctly, visual evidence takes precedence over commentary.

The transgender issue is irrelevant here; everything I stated would apply to any other biological male character regardless of gender identity. The visual evidence in the image points to it being 1boy and 1girl. If there is a good reason to keep this non-androgynous Bridget post as 2boys, I would appreciate an explanation.

Blank_User said:

I can't see any reason to tag this as 2boys. Bridget clearly looks female in this, and not in the otoko no ko manner. The breasts and thighs give it away. The only hint about Bridget being a boy is in the commentary (which was previously untranslated), and it sounds more like the assistant is referring to canon Bridget rather than the artist's interpretation in the image. And if I understand correctly, visual evidence takes precedence over commentary.

The transgender issue is irrelevant here; everything I stated would apply to any other biological male character regardless of gender identity. The visual evidence in the image points to it being 1boy and 1girl. If there is a good reason to keep this non-androgynous Bridget post as 2boys, I would appreciate an explanation.

You could edit it back and ask for a mod to weigh in.

cokerpilot said:

You could edit it back and ask for a mod to weigh in.

I'm acting conservatively because these posts tend to attract edit wars. Since there have not been any arguments provided against mine yet, I changed it once more. If it gets changed back with no attempt to justify it, I'll consider my next steps then.

Blank_User said:

I can't see any reason to tag this as 2boys. Bridget clearly looks female in this, and not in the otoko no ko manner. The breasts and thighs give it away. The only hint about Bridget being a boy is in the commentary (which was previously untranslated), and it sounds more like the assistant is referring to canon Bridget rather than the artist's interpretation in the image. And if I understand correctly, visual evidence takes precedence over commentary.

The transgender issue is irrelevant here; everything I stated would apply to any other biological male character regardless of gender identity. The visual evidence in the image points to it being 1boy and 1girl. If there is a good reason to keep this non-androgynous Bridget post as 2boys, I would appreciate an explanation.

She's also explicitly addresses as such in this pic

helljumperhelljumper said:

She's also explicitly addresses as such in this pic

She's wearing the exact same outfit she was when she identified as a boy. It's called crossdressing.

blindVigil said:

She's wearing the exact same outfit she was when she identified as a boy. It's called crossdressing.

You're misreading the spammer's comment on this one, the top right speech bubble refers to her as female.

Incineration said:

You're misreading the spammer's comment on this one, the top right speech bubble refers to her as female.

I sure did read "addresses" as "dresses" lol. Oops