How does a nose scar go across the face and nose bridge without cutting through the nose itself? And why is it such a common design?

Bionicman76 said:

How does a nose scar go across the face and nose bridge without cutting through the nose itself? And why is it such a common design?

Because anime aesthetics means physics and anatomy can eat shit.
Same reason why characters can have a vertical scar across their eye and cheek without losing vision in that eye or how you can get cool cross-shaped scars by somehow getting hit on the same spot but with different angles despite the angle of attack makes absolutely no sense trajectory-wise.

No, an eye scar can possibly miss the eye so thats actually plausible. Also I think a clean enough cut in a modern setting can possibly be fixed.

Bionicman76 said:

No, an eye scar can possibly miss the eye so thats actually plausible. Also I think a clean enough cut in a modern setting can possibly be fixed.

The eyelid thickness averages on around 2 milimeters. The average depth of the 'dip' between the apex of your closed eyelid and your brows are 0.3-0.5 centimeters.

If the scar goes across the brow and whole eye, lid and all it's IMPOSSIBLE to miss the eyeball, given the presence of said dip. Yet characters like Zaraki Kenpachi still has their eye intact.

Rathurue said:

The eyelid thickness averages on around 2 milimeters. The average depth of the 'dip' between the apex of your closed eyelid and your brows are 0.3-0.5 centimeters.

If the scar goes across the brow and whole eye, lid and all it's IMPOSSIBLE to miss the eyeball, given the presence of said dip. Yet characters like Zaraki Kenpachi still has their eye intact.

Venom snake has that and many others. And its still possible when all micro-movements are possible variables i.e. dodging, shaky hand, etc.

Bionicman76 said:

Venom snake has that and many others.

Did you seriously just cite a fictional character as evidence that something can happen in real life?

iridescent_slime said:

Did you seriously just cite a fictional character as evidence that something can happen in real life?

When has metal gear ever not been realistic? It's obviously a possibility whereas the other one isn't, and I've never seen it look good on any character besides ginko.

Bionicman76 said:

When has metal gear ever not been realistic?

I'm sorry? Did you by chance miss the fuckoff huge mech in 1980s Afghanistan or the American Senator with motherfucking Nanomachines, Son?

bunkhead said:

I'm sorry? Did you by chance miss the fuckoff huge mech in 1980s Afghanistan or the American Senator with motherfucking Nanomachines, Son?

Or you the cybernetic ninja throwing around said giant mechas.

Ground zeroes was pretty normal at least.