Danbooru
Login Posts Comments Notes Artists Tags Pools Wiki Forum More » Listing Upload Hot Changes Help

Search

Blacklisted (help)

  • guro
  • scat
  • furry -rating:g
Disable all Re-enable all

Artist

  • ? konakona 191

Copyrights

  • ? naruto (series) 18k
  • ? ↳ naruto (classic) 9.2k

Character

  • ? hyuuga hinata 3.7k

General

  • ? 3girls 265k
  • ? after sex 41k
  • ? blush 3.2M
  • ? breasts 3.8M
  • ? bukkake 14k
  • ? censored 505k
  • ? cum 271k
  • ? cum in pussy 112k
  • ? cum on body 102k
  • ? cum on breasts 43k
  • ? cumdrip 34k
  • ? facial 49k
  • ? futa with female 17k
  • ? futanari 38k
  • ? greyscale 545k
  • ? monochrome 685k
  • ? mosaic censoring 223k
  • ? multiple girls 1.7M
  • ? multiple penises 27k
  • ? nipples 907k
  • ? penis 455k
  • ? pointless censoring 15k
  • ? solo focus 393k

Meta

  • ? commentary request 3.6M

Information

  • ID: 680959
  • Uploader: Jibajab »
  • Date: about 15 years ago
  • Approver: Seem »
  • Size: 65.3 KB .jpg (566x800) »
  • Source: pixiv.net/artworks/10983303 »
  • Rating: Explicit
  • Score: 30
  • Favorites: 119
  • Status: Active

Options

  • Resize to window
  • Find similar
  • Download

History

  • Tags
  • Pools
  • Notes
  • Moderation
  • Commentary
This post belongs to a parent (learn more) « hide
post #680957
hyuuga hinata (naruto) drawn by konakona

Artist's commentary

  • Original
  • デフォルメエッチ

    最近、デフォルメの効いたエロ作品を描いてみたかったのでやってみましたよ。 いつもの三人に頑張ってもらいました。 やってみて思ったこと・・・ 一朝一夕で習得できるもんじゃないなってこと( TωT.)一貫して同じデフォルメで描ききれませんでしたとさ! 一つのデフォルメの形を確定した後それで毎回かけるかを検証。 出来るようになったらうんたらかんたら・・・ まあ練習していきます。 そろそろカラー絵の一つでも描かんと!

    • ‹ prev Search: user:Jibajab next ›
  • Comments
  • Recommended
  • Loading...

    Niiba
    about 15 years ago
    [hidden]

    Now my question is: Should this one also be tagged as futanari? Because we know its the conclussion of the previous two in which futa-Sakura and futa-Ino fucked Hinata, and its obvious these are their dicks...but in this pic, technically, we can't "see" them as the owners of said dicks, even though we know they are.

    So, does the "tag what you see and not what you know" rule, apply here?

  • 0
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Dogenzaka
    about 15 years ago
    [hidden]

    It's futa. If this image is in procession of the others, then futa still applies, even if you can't exactly see it.

  • 1
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    CxHxA
    about 15 years ago
    [hidden]

    What I now is that you tag what you see. From the image we
    can´t say they are futas, so no tag.

  • 0
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    sgcdonmai
    about 15 years ago
    [hidden]

    Dogenzaka said:
    It's futa. If this image is in procession of the others, then futa still applies, even if you can't exactly see it.

    That is precisely opposite of what tagging policy on Danbooru is.

    It doesn't matter if it's part of a sequence of images that feature futanari - if it's not completely obvious from this picture alone that those with dicks are otherwise chicks, then it doesn't get the tag.

    Removing tags.

  • 0
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Dogenzaka
    about 15 years ago
    [hidden]

    sgcdonmai said:
    That is precisely opposite of what tagging policy on Danbooru is.

    It doesn't matter if it's part of a sequence of images that feature futanari - if it's not completely obvious from this picture alone that those with dicks are otherwise chicks, then it doesn't get the tag.

    Removing tags.

    post #553907?

  • 0
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    sgcdonmai
    about 15 years ago
    [hidden]

    Dogenzaka said:
    post #553907?

    The text on the right side of the image has the speaker - Remilia, as the small illustration shows - putting their dick inside Remilia.

    That's not context from outside the picture. The text, and everything else there, are part of the image.

  • 0
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Lord Yahweh
    almost 15 years ago
    [hidden]

    The policy is really stupid, then, because it means that if someone liked a picture of part of a set looks for the other pictures then they stumble upon the futanari.

    Unless danbooru is trying to promote a 'surprise! dickgirl' policy.

  • 0
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    sgcdonmai
    almost 15 years ago
    [hidden]

    Lord_Yahweh said:
    The policy is really stupid, then, because it means that if someone liked a picture of part of a set looks for the other pictures then they stumble upon the futanari.

    Unless danbooru is trying to promote a 'surprise! dickgirl' policy.

    It's more of a "we don't give a shit what you do not like, and you're a dumbass for not blacklisting something you don't want to see" policy, which is perfectly sensible.

  • -1
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Xanryuu
    over 14 years ago
    [hidden]

    There are worse surprises.

  • 1
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    THE END
    Terms / Privacy / Upgrade / Contact /