Strange. Difficult to believe this person made such huge drawing progress in a little over 8 weeks - check the Pixiv. I suspect some sort of AI manipulation going on here (background, anatomy, perspective, shading, eye shape etc.)
Strange. Difficult to believe this person made such huge drawing progress in a little over 8 weeks - check the Pixiv. I suspect some sort of AI manipulation going on here (background, anatomy, perspective, shading, eye shape etc.)
It's like night and day, there's no way this isn't AI.
Yeah, this is a little sus. Checked their Pixiv, this has to be mostly AI-generated with some minor editing from the artist themselves to perhaps clean up the image and make sure that it isn't obviously AI. This art style is nothing like what they originally had.
I kept looking trying to figure out if it was Ai too, but the lines and simplistic shading especially made it look more like they drew over an Ai generated image, ironing out usual Ai issues. Hair, shirt patterns and hands are all too good.
I kept looking trying to figure out if it was Ai too, but the lines and simplistic shading especially made it look more like they drew over an Ai generated image, ironing out usual Ai issues. Hair, shirt patterns and hands are all too good.
I've seen AI make normal hands, it's not common but it happens. Regardless, I find it hard to believe that in 8 weeks someone with DA level art skills could improve enough to fix common AI problems without the edits being painfully obvious. At minimum this has to be at least 90% AI, and I'd be surprised if it wasn't more.
It's kind of funny. We've advanced so far that we're using computerized neural pathways to generate futa ballsacks, and it's causing controversy. On a sidenote, I don't support AI generated art, as an artist of a different medium myself, since it destroys the whole meaning of art. But I appreciate the shitshow. Gonna be a lot of fun having designated AI art spotters