Given that the picture says "Ashlock vs Flametail" and Ashlock is female, plus the artist's large library of futanari, I took the liberty of removing the 1boy tag and adding implied_futanari.
Okay @SSJG Please explain why a penis shadow implied by information within the image to be attached to a girl should be tagged 1boy & hetero, instead of just silently tag warring over it while apparently mass adding the two to images without even looking at them.
Okay @SSJG Please explain why a penis shadow implied by information within the image to be attached to a girl should be tagged 1boy & hetero, instead of just silently tag warring over it while apparently mass adding the two to images without even looking at them.
@blindVigil I'm not familiar with the characters. It's true that I didn't open the picture full size, but there's nothing here that would suggest it being attached to a female. If that's the case, then it shouldn't be tagged implied_futanari if there's a big ol' cock clearly visible.
@blindVigil I'm not familiar with the characters. It's true that I didn't open the picture full size, but there's nothing here that would suggest it being attached to a female. If that's the case, then it shouldn't be tagged implied_futanari if there's a big ol' cock clearly visible.
You mean besides the text right at the top saying "Ashlock vs Flametail," which is flipped on the child post? Those two characters are girls, btw.
I would say it's implied because you can't see who the dick is attached to, which is also why I refrained from changing it to 2girls. I don't entirely agree with shadows being included in gender counts.
You mean besides the text right at the top saying "Ashlock vs Flametail," which is flipped on the child post? Those two characters are girls, btw.
I would say it's implied because you can't see who the dick is attached to, which is also why I refrained from changing it to 2girls. I don't entirely agree with shadows being included in gender counts.
When a shadow is this detailed, I don't think it even counts as a shadow, it's just a transparent penis. It's not even projected onto anything the way a shadow should. It's more than enough to indicate a character's presence. Furthermore, the pic definitely shouldn't have implied_futanari, which is only for when the penis is not visible.
When a shadow is this detailed, I don't think it even counts as a shadow, it's just a transparent penis. It's not even projected onto anything the way a shadow should. It's more than enough to indicate a character's presence. Furthermore, the pic definitely shouldn't have implied_futanari, which is only for when the penis is not visible.
When was the last time you actually read the implied futanari wiki? That line was removed a while ago, and it's never been mutually exclusive with futanari.
What we have here is a silhouette of a penis, with text implying it's attached to a girl. You don't see the girl, just the penis. If that's not "implied futanari", then what is? Do people searching 2girls want to see a disembodied penis silhouette?
When was the last time you actually read the implied futanari wiki? That line was removed a while ago, and it's never been mutually exclusive with futanari.
What we have here is a silhouette of a penis, with text implying it's attached to a girl. You don't see the girl, just the penis. If that's not "implied futanari", then what is? Do people searching 2girls want to see a disembodied penis silhouette?
I think the current wiki description covers it pretty well. "When a character in the image seems to be a futanari, but it's not immediately obvious. Signs of futanari include visible genitals/testicles, or intercourse with a stomach bulge and cum" That definitely excludes this picture which shows a dick center and front. As for the 2girls search, those who don't want to see it probably have futanari blacklisted. There is more than one character in this pic, and one of those just happens to be a futanari of which only the penis is visible.
