Resized to 94% of original (view original)
megurine luka and takoluka (vocaloid) drawn by aka_ume

Artist's commentary

  • Original
    •

    たこたこ

    色々見てまわっているといまさらながら、素敵なキャラを見つけて嬉しくなってしまう今日この頃｜※ノノ）こしょｗ、こう言うぬいぐるみがほし…げふげふｗ｜ω・´）。くわりｗ！！

  • Comments
  • Recommended
    •
    LittleFuzzy
    [hidden]

    I cannot see any reason to consider this a "what" pic that wouldn't apply equally to ANY picture of Takoluka. If it was a human or humanoid woman self-pleasuring with a dildo, no one would even think of putting a "what" tag on, not even if there was an artificial vagina in the picture as well. Those who are calling this "what" are simply reacting to Takoluka's weird (but well-established) character design.

    Now if Takoluka was pleasuring herself with a dildo while Fist of the North Star Ronald McDonald looked on, *then* you'd have "what" material. This isn't "what".

  • -1
  • Reply
    • Rampardos
    [hidden]

    If you guys don't think a disembodied head with tentacles for hair fucking itself in what I guess is its throat is weird then you need to go see a doctor..

    I think you should see LittleFuzzy's comment. Breaking down what is going on by looking at it in the most superficial sense does not qualify something for a what tag, otherwise there'd be plenty of other characters or things that would require it in every picture they appear.

    This is just another rule 34 picture of a popular character. The weirdness of that character is completely irrelevant to this picture.

  • 0
  • Reply
    • Dr Fine Rolo
    [hidden]

    He did it because that is traditionally how people say this doesn't deserve the what tag.

    For example:
    "This is not appropriate use of the what tag, it is takoluka fucking herself in the throat with a vibrator"
    or
    "This is not appropriate use of the what tag, it is a woman's disembodied head with tentacles for hair fucking herself in the throat with a vibrator"

    Since it's a subjective tag I don't know WHY people have such a stick up their butt about what is 'not' what.

    Tags are descriptive and should be added wherever someone thinks them appropriate, it does no great harm to this particular post to also be 'what', and a lot of people looking at 'what' as their main subject will say 'yes, what?' as is quite obvious by the WAR going on in this post's tag history.

    The only argument I see to remove a tag from a post that does not exactly apply to it is because it will pollute the meaning of the tag or make it difficult to find things within in the tag. I usually use what to modify my searches, not as a main browsing pool. "What was that crazy post that made me go 'what' of takoluka fucking herself in the throat." "what takoluka" Oh yeah, right there. #3.

    If the regular 'what' browsers are so offended by something so mundane as a disembodied head having throat sex, they should elect someone to monitor a what pool, and the should be abolished.

    I never had a pissing contest when someone added something crazy to vip_quality. It was just a joke tag I had with another member where we'd elect the best post albert made that day. We probably would have used a pool if they existed.

    Whoever cares most (or is elected) should just be made 'what' czar, translate them all into a pool, and everyone stop bitching about it so I can stop reading bullshit like 'this is not appropriate use of the what tag, it is just cthulhu fasdjkln a human afdsjlk'

  • 1
  • Reply
    • Dr Fine Rolo
    [hidden]

    There was. I don't really care that much about the what tag. I care in that, I'm tired of reading other people arguing about it very 40th post.

    "Dur, this is not 'what'"
    "Well it obviously IS to someone. How are you defining this tag? Majority rules? YOU rule? What the hell. Do it and shut up."

  • 2
  • Reply
    • jognrun
    [hidden]

    Rampardos said:
    This is just another rule 34 picture of a popular character. The weirdness of that character is completely irrelevant to this picture.

    Quoting the "Tagging Rules" on the wiki

    "Tags should contain only the visual & factual elements in the image and not anything subject to opinion."

    In that case the "what" tag shouldn't exist as we seem to have some troubled people who think that a moefied decapitated head/octopus crossover is a perfectly normal occurrence in everyday life.

    However, looking at what the "what" tag defines as "what" I would say that this most definitely qualifies as "what", seriously who when looking at this image instantly thought: "Oh it's just takoluka masturbating, hahaha...ha",rather than: "Where the fuck is the dildo going, what is the plastic pussy for and since she can't have a bladder is that her brain juice pouring out?!". At the moment the image would seem to have the "what" tag but who knows what you crazy ocd/aspergers fools will get into an argument over next ;)

  • 0
  • Reply
    • vocaloidmaster
    [hidden]

    Uh,............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................What?

  • -2
  • Reply