... honestly, I'm still not positive. What's our "thickness" criterion? Maybe the girl on the right wins in overall coverage, but the girl on the left seems to have coarser hair.
I guess the deciding factor is that they each seem to have the same amount of pubic hair, but the larger girl has more vulvar surface area that the hair is occupying, so the other one's hair is thicker on a purely density-based metric.
Anyway, ladies, I thank you, and science thanks you
(Kinda got distracted by trying to decide whether the proper adjective is "vulvar" or "vulval", but it turns out both are acceptable.)
... honestly, I'm still not positive. What's our "thickness" criterion? Maybe the girl on the right wins in overall coverage, but the girl on the left seems to have coarser hair.
I guess the deciding factor is that they each seem to have the same amount of pubic hair, but the larger girl has more vulvar surface area that the hair is occupying, so the other one's hair is thicker on a purely density-based metric.
Anyway, ladies, I thank you, and science thanks you
(Kinda got distracted by trying to decide whether the proper adjective is "vulvar" or "vulval", but it turns out both are acceptable.)
