You're asking yourself why you never blocked the bestiality tag?
some people are too "busy" for that. instead they complain about a tag that they find disturbing since that fixes the issue apparently. tbh idfk what their logic is here
some people are too "busy" for that. instead they complain about a tag that they find disturbing since that fixes the issue apparently. tbh idfk what their logic is here
I guess people are supposed to assume that a character they like would be getting fucked by animals? Besides it's as unnecessary as projection porn. There's no real objective reason for it to exist. kuroda kunika is a person and seeing these girls used as sex toys annoys a lot of people including those who understand what projection is and what it has lead to I.E men enslaving themselves through their women, going to war for a single person ( Troy ) etc. ( Capping this for my security incase I'm banned again because exercising my free speech is hatred for some reason. )
I guess people are supposed to assume that a character they like would be getting fucked by animals? Besides it's as unnecessary as projection porn. There's no real objective reason for it to exist. kuroda kunika is a person and seeing these girls used as sex toys annoys a lot of people including those who understand what projection is and what it has lead to I.E men enslaving themselves through their women, going to war for a single person ( Troy ) etc. ( Capping this for my security incase I'm banned again because exercising my free speech is hatred for some reason. )
Okay, first of all. There's no objective reason for porn to exist at all. It only exists to provide positive sensory input. This is just as true for your beloved yuri as it is bestiality. Second, all porn is projection. No matter what kind it is, it is form of fantasy fulfillment for the viewer. Hetero porn is projection, for both men and women. Lesbian porn is projection, for both men and women. Stop acting like yuri is some holy grail.
Third, shut the fuck up about projection, no one cares. Making your obnoxious soapbox comments shorter isn't going to stop you from getting banned for continuing to do the thing that got you banned the first time. Free speech does not mean you can just say whatever the hell you want without consequences.
Edit: Also you favorited this! Despite comparing it to your evil "projection porn"
Setsuna014 said: ( Capping this for my security incase I'm banned again because exercising my free speech is hatred for some reason. )
The reason you got banned was not free speech, but the fact that you kept posting anti-women rants and even went so far as to use a sockpuppet to pretend you were the widow of a dead soldier to agree with yourself.
The reason you got banned was not free speech, but the fact that you kept posting anti-woman rants and event went so far as to use a sockpuppet to pretend you were the widow of a dead soldier to agree with yourself.
Okay, first of all. There's no objective reason for porn to exist at all. It only exists to provide positive sensory input. This is just as true for your beloved yuri as it is bestiality. Second, all porn is projection. No matter what kind it is, it is form of fantasy fulfillment for the viewer. Hetero porn is projection, for both men and women. Lesbian porn is projection, for both men and women. Stop acting like yuri is some holy grail.
Third, shut the fuck up about projection, no one cares. Making your obnoxious soapbox comments shorter isn't going to stop you from getting banned for continuing to do the thing that got you banned the first time. Free speech does not mean you can just say whatever the hell you want without consequences.
Edit: Also you favorited this! Despite comparing it to your evil "projection porn"
Never did I say it was nor did I imply that it was. Besides that you missed the whole point of what I said and decided to take me out of context and just use sophistry. I'm also certain I didn't upvote your comment. You also assumed I have no idea how free speech works along side the consequences that can come with talking about certain things.
The reason you got banned was not free speech, but the fact that you kept posting anti-woman rants and event went so far as to use a sockpuppet to pretend you were the widow of a dead soldier to agree with yourself.
So I know you're wrong beyond believe because I posted evidence to my " Anti-women rants " Yes because talking female nature is " anti-women " somehow.
Heck you just linked me what I had said, the proof is in the pudding.
As for the Sockpuppet account you accused me of having what proof do you have that it's linked to me? In the end how was any of this " Anti-women " I mean you know everything about me it seems and my lived experience, so please tell me how I was wrong in anyway.
Mate, they're a mod, they can tell when a sock puppet account is one, it's not that hard, you've been caught, give up rofl.
Still doesn't justify banning that woman nor does it prove I'm wrong. I have what was said that lead to false claims of having a sockpuppet account and a 7 day ban. The point isn't that I got banned, the point is that I was falsely accused of wrong doing and to make it worse someone else was unjustly punished for it. That's why I'm not just going to " Give up "
Nice try pal, but they're a Mod, that means they can see the IP address of both accounts. Unless both you and "that woman" are living together, you're going to have to explain why both you and her have the same IP address, aka, posting from the exact same location.
The evidence is right there and normally when you try to prove someone wrong you provide evidence to said wrongdoings or is that just to difficult?
In the end it's unfalsifiable and I'm done with this since I'm stupidly trying to convince others of sophistry. P.S What's your stake in this why're you even commenting in the first place?
What evidence have you provided? Your posts were deleted? Yeah, we know that already, the staff has said as such, hell, they handed you the images, that doesn't prove that you weren't the sockpuppet account in the slightest, and the fact that the staff knows the other account is you, that says everything that needs to be said. You're trying to say that the fingerprints aren't yours when they match up to the ones on the gun, bub.
That link I posted. It clearly shows what I've said verbatim and the response I got from said posts, so yes, yes I am saying the finger prints aren't mine and the burden of proof is on you to prove me wrong. Heck I'm clearly using my own account to speak with you. If I really wanted to do anything wrong other then state what should be obvious, then I never would've wasted time using my own account which can easily be removed or banned indefinitely.
Dude, we're not here to satisfy your mental instability. Please just look silently at some yuri images and be done with it. Your complete attitude of being annyoing will only get you another ban.
That link I posted. It clearly shows what I've said verbatim and the response I got from said posts, so yes, yes I am saying the finger prints aren't mine and the burden of proof is on you to prove me wrong. Heck I'm clearly using my own account to speak with you. If I really wanted to do anything wrong other then state what should be obvious, then I never would've wasted time using my own account which can easily be removed or banned indefinitely.