Isn't this bad anatomy since her top half is a complete 180 degrees after it reaches past her stomach area?

Whoa, what is going on with her? Her chest and waist are facing opposite directions.

Trying to comprehend these bizarre geometries gives me a legit headache.

ampzz said:

Isn't this bad anatomy since her top half is a complete 180 degrees after it reaches past her stomach area?

Blindga said:

Whoa, what is going on with her? Her chest and waist are facing opposite directions.

Trying to comprehend these bizarre geometries gives me a legit headache.

It feels like this is just the usual twisted torso situation.

ampzz said:

Isn't this bad anatomy since her top half is a complete 180 degrees after it reaches past her stomach area?

It's humanely possible. For someone like a gymnast, anyway.

But in this image, the wrong detail is how the chest area rotates differently from the rest of the spine. It's not a 180, she's not an owl, yanno-just a measly 60 degrees or so, but the transition of the stomach and the chest was not portrayed correctly: the problem lies in how the stomach was drawn away from viewers, while with that pose it ought to gradually turn clockwise the more you transition to chest, toward the viewer.

So yeah, in my opinion this is not the usual twisted_torso situation, but a bad_anatomy.

Rathurue said:

It's humanely possible. For someone like a gymnast, anyway.

But in this image, the wrong detail is how the chest area rotates differently from the rest of the spine. It's not a 180, she's not an owl, yanno-just a measly 60 degrees or so, but the transition of the stomach and the chest was not portrayed correctly: the problem lies in how the stomach was drawn away from viewers, while with that pose it ought to gradually turn clockwise the more you transition to chest, toward the viewer.

So yeah, in my opinion this is not the usual twisted_torso situation, but a bad_anatomy.

It's always funny how NONE of the example images fits the post in question. And this is always the case.
The first image in your link is humanly possible...she's a human after all. But in the example you only see ONE breast. Here you see two and breasts may be squishy to some extend, however these bounds are broken here.
As well drawn as it might be otherwise, this flaw leads me to not approve this image.

Provence said:

It's always funny how NONE of the example images fits the post in question. And this is always the case.
The first image in your link is humanly possible...she's a human after all. But in the example you only see ONE breast. Here you see two and breasts may be squishy to some extend, however these bounds are broken here.
As well drawn as it might be otherwise, this flaw leads me to not approve this image.

Uh, that argument was not me defending the post...I described what was wrong with how it was drawn.