What's the difference with post #2857185?

- Most lossless file format (png > jpg). See also lossy-lossless, in the case a png is more lossy than its most original jpeg counterpart.

kudus said:

- Most lossless file format (png > jpg). See also lossy-lossless, in the case a png is more lossy than its most original jpeg counterpart.

But both are jpeg format. And post #2857258 has 215096 bytes, post #2857185 has 215066 bytes.

Bisko said:

But both are jpeg format.

Hah? you must be kidding me

if like that my post will get delete

Seriously, i'm against with this situation

if no difference, so why have 2 post.

kudus said:

Seriously, i'm against with this situation

if no difference, so why have 2 post.

Both images have different sources(Pixiv/niconico)? Idk, even I'M puzzled as why we need to double post if they're the same image despite having different sources.

MikeyPhalanx said:

Both images have different sources(Pixiv/niconico)? Idk, even I'M puzzled as why we need to double post if they're the same image despite having different sources.

No, both images have different filesize and MD5 hash. For example, post #2689682(313949 bytes) and post #2689610(313928 bytes), post #2684189(381044 bytes) and post #2684178(380995 bytes) they don't have any difference, but post #2689682 and post #2684189 have higher filesize.

Bisko said:

No, both images have different filesize and MD5 hash. For example, post #2689682(313949 bytes) and post #2689610(313928 bytes), post #2684189(381044 bytes) and post #2684178(380995 bytes) they don't have any difference, but post #2689682 and post #2684189 have higher filesize.

So what's difference between this image and my post?

kudus said:

So what's difference between this image and my post?

Outwardly both images don't have any difference. But, they have different filesize and MD5 hash.