When I uploaded this, I too noticed it was different from the others and I was just asking who the two were that weren't in the other pics in this set. And lolicon isn't a problem.
Kwik said: When I uploaded this, I too noticed it was different from the others and I was just asking who the two were that weren't in the other pics in this set. And lolicon isn't a problem.
If you don't think there's anything wrong with animated child porn, then you have major issues. :(
Yes, because we all know that drawn fictional little girls are accurate depictions of real children and having an interest in them will inevitably lead us down the path of becoming pedophiles. Only a person with some major issues would ever enjoy such a thing, probably just as bad as a person who would join up to a website that has such material to criticize those who enjoy it.
NWF_Renim said: probably just as bad as a person who would join up to a website that has such material to criticize those who enjoy it.
This site isn't only about drawn little girls, so it's safe to say he joined for some other reason than to criticise you. For instance in order to enjoy drawings of adult women. And are you seriously comparing pedophilia to joining a website just to complain about said website? What are you, insane?
The user joined on the same day he posted those comments. He has 0 favorites, 0 edits, and the only thing listed from him at all is of course that he posted one comment, the one above. Since you can't leave comments without an account, I'd say there is a very high probability the only reason he joined was of course to post that one single comment.
Personally I wouldn't care except that the first notable thing he did was start criticizing others.
Leave a comment