Danbooru
Login Posts Comments Notes Artists Tags Pools Wiki Forum More » Listing Upload Hot Changes Help

Search

Blacklisted (help)

  • guro
  • scat
  • furry -rating:g
Disable all Re-enable all

Artist

  • ? sakiyamama 1.1k

Copyright

  • ? kantai collection 510k

Character

  • ? nagato (kancolle) 9.7k

General

  • ? 1girl 6.6M
  • ? alternate costume 492k
  • ? bare shoulders 1.1M
  • ? black hair 1.7M
  • ? breasts 3.8M
  • ? cleavage 1.1M
  • ? collarbone 872k
  • ? covering breasts 22k
  • ? covering privates 49k
  • ? eyebrows 42k
  • ? hair between eyes 1.3M
  • ? headgear 86k
  • ? japanese clothes 429k
  • ? kimono 265k
  • ? large breasts 1.8M
  • ? long hair 4.8M
  • ? looking at viewer 3.7M
  • ? obi 89k
  • ? open mouth 2.7M
  • ? red eyes 1.4M
  • ? sash 156k
  • ? solo 5.5M
  • ? striped clothes 259k
  • ? striped kimono 2.7k
  • ? twitter username 311k
  • ? wide sleeves 283k
  • ? yukata 26k

Meta

  • ? commentary request 3.6M

Information

  • ID: 2514670
  • Uploader: used 491970 »
  • Date: over 8 years ago
  • Approver: user 460797 »
  • Size: 842 KB .png (800x1131) »
  • Source: twitter.com/sakiyamama/status/787249488251412481 »
  • Rating: Sensitive
  • Score: 27
  • Favorites: 34
  • Status: Active

Options

  • Resize to window
  • Find similar
  • Download

History

  • Tags
  • Pools
  • Notes
  • Moderation
  • Commentary
This post belongs to a parent (learn more) « hide
post #2508347
This post has 0 children (learn more) « hide
post #2514670
nagato (kantai collection) drawn by sakiyamama

Artist's commentary

  • Original
  • 浴衣はだけ長門「長門型の装甲は伊達ではないよ。」
    #艦これ #艦隊これくしょん

  • Comments
  • Recommended
  • Loading...

    user 460797
    over 8 years ago
    [hidden]

    @MyrMindservant
    You know that this is a Twitter version and the pixiv version is also here?
    So it is only logical to create an extended parent-child relationship here.

  • 0
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    MyrMindservant
    over 8 years ago
    [hidden]

    Provence said:

    You know that this is a Twitter version and the pixiv version is also here?
    So it is only logical to create an extended parent-child relationship here.

    Our approach/policy was always to avoid extended parent-child relationships when possible. And this case doesn't look like it's really necessary.

    If you know about some newer decision regarding this, then link me to the relevant forum thread.

  • 0
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    user 460797
    over 8 years ago
    [hidden]

    MyrMindservant said:

    Our approach/policy was always to avoid extended parent-child relationships when possible. And this case doesn't look like it's really necessary.

    If you know about some newer decision regarding this, then link me to the relevant forum thread.

    Eh, so could you link this then? There is nothing about in the post relationship wiki and the "policy" is that pixiv versions should always be the parent of Twitter version if the Twitter isn't bigger. So this here is a Twitter upload and the other one a pixiv post. Looks pretty clear.
    So we have a derivative post (the parent is the yukata without showing cleavage) and further we have Pixiv > Twitter?
    But if this was discussed before, I want to read this.

  • 0
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    OMGkillitwithfire
    over 8 years ago
    [hidden]

    MyrMindservant said:

    Our approach/policy was always to avoid extended parent-child relationships when possible.

    I don't recall reading this policy anywhere on Danbooru. Link if you would?

  • 0
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    MyrMindservant
    over 8 years ago
    [hidden]

    It's pretty hard to find when and where exactly it was decided because, as I've said before, it was always* a preferred approach to avoid extended post relationships.
    *by this I mean that it was already in place when I started to contribute to the site in 2011

    Albert even tried to get rid of this option completely (with release of Danbooru 2, in 2013), but apparently it was too troublesome with all the relationships already in place, so he enabled it again later.
    I can't find the relevant discussion at the moment, quite some time has passed after all, but you can see these forum posts for a proof that extended post relationships were indeed disabled for some time: forum #85250, forum #85286. I'll try to look again later, perhaps it is at GitHub rather than the forum.

  • 0
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Terms / Privacy / Upgrade / Contact /