I'm not sure if I've just been noticing it more or if there's actually been more of them, but I have been seeing a lot of uploads with face-on-the-lower-half-of-bean-shaped-head syndrome recently. This one's head is shaped right, at least.
I mean, i get it - it's pretty derpy face an it can be viewed as bad, but there's one problem - we already have 532 pictures from this artist, and i think that is aknowledged that his/her/whatever faces are rather bad. If they were not a problem for 7 years (first Osashin's image on danbooru is 7 years old), then why they are a problem right now?
Might as well start deleting everything anime related from Danbooru.
Why always so salty? The facts are: The left eye is misplaced. It is nearly at her ear. Eyes are too far apart. And probably some other flaws, too. But that here isn't that good.
Why always so salty? The facts are: The left eye is misplaced. It is nearly at her ear. Eyes are too far apart. And probably some other flaws, too. But that here isn't that good.
It's not salt, it's just flaggers doing poor job, changing definition of "acceptable quality" everytime when they fucking want. It's ridiculous and shall be stopped, preferably right now.
It's not salt, it's just flaggers doing poor job, changing definition of "acceptable quality" everytime when they fucking want. It's ridiculous and shall be stopped, preferably right now.
The majority of flaggers tend to point out flaws existing in the image, then approvers weigh the severity of said flaw. Some have higher tolerances for flaws than others. Flaggers who don't understand the system (i.e. the couple that were recently flagging things for being "NSFW") get stopped. So, if anything, you should be upset at approvers for whether or not the flagging is upheld, I guess. I'm pretty used to people being mad at us as they get overly attached to one thing or another, I assume the others are too. Or they just ignore it.