if it's a good quality image, it's a goo quality image, being off topic is irrelevant.

Is a caveat really needed in the flag reason?

cd_young said:

if it's a good quality image, it's a goo quality image, being off topic is irrelevant.

Actually it's how goo the quality is that's irreverent. High res photos of waterfalls are also good quality, want to start uploading some of them now?

chinatsu_(sweetpea) said:

Is a caveat really needed in the flag reason?

Actually it's how goo the quality is that's irreverent. High res photos of waterfalls are also good quality, want to start uploading some of them now?

Maybe not photos, but what's with drawings >:3?

Toskana said:

Maybe not photos, but what's with drawings >:3?

I said photo for a reason. I think illustrated waterfalls are in the same class as landscapes and help to similar standards.

cd_young said:

if it's a good quality image, it's a goo quality image, being off topic is irrelevant.

You cannot possibly be serious. "Off topic" is literally the first reason listed under the flagging dialog.