Danbooru
Login Posts Comments Notes Artists Tags Pools Wiki Forum More » Listing Upload Hot Changes Help

Search

Blacklisted (help)

  • guro
  • scat
  • furry -rating:g
Disable all Re-enable all

Artist

  • ? takana shinno 708

Copyright

  • ? touhou 938k

Character

  • ? kochiya sanae 37k

General

  • ? 1girl 6.6M
  • ? ass 643k
  • ? barefoot 404k
  • ? blush 3.2M
  • ? bra 221k
  • ? feet 221k
  • ? green hair 464k
  • ? long hair 4.8M
  • ? open mouth 2.6M
  • ? panties 692k
  • ? solo 5.5M
  • ? underwear 851k
  • ? underwear only 69k
  • ? yellow eyes 779k

Meta

  • ? commentary request 3.6M

Information

  • ID: 2085013
  • Uploader: aimaispice »
  • Date: almost 10 years ago
  • Approver: TunerAinee »
  • Size: 40 KB .jpg (722x512) »
  • Source: twitter.com/synno_takana/status/627382158991032321 »
  • Rating: Questionable
  • Score: 20
  • Favorites: 24
  • Status: Active

Options

  • Resize to window
  • Find similar
  • Download

History

  • Tags
  • Pools
  • Notes
  • Moderation
  • Commentary
kochiya sanae (touhou) drawn by takana_shinno

Artist's commentary

  • Original
  • 暑いですネ( ゚д゚)

    • ‹ prev Search: user:aimaispice next ›
  • Comments
  • Recommended
  • Loading...

    aimaispice
    almost 10 years ago
    [hidden]

    To the mods who reviewed this, seriously?

  • -2
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    OOZ662
    almost 10 years ago
    [hidden]

    KamiNoKiseki said:

    To the mods who reviewed this, seriously?

    What's the upside of this image? What makes it stand out next to any other image of Sanae? It's small, simple, basically shaded, has simple linework and basic anatomy including a very simple face with eyes a bit large, and is artifacted due to being a JPEG from Twitter.

    There's nothing to particularly dislike about the image; I find little to be revolted by in it. But, I'm also not motivated to put my name next to its approval.

  • 3
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    aimaispice
    almost 10 years ago
    [hidden]

    OOZ662 said:

    What's the upside of this image? What makes it stand out next to any other image of Sanae? It's small, simple, basically shaded, has simple linework and basic anatomy including a very simple face with eyes a bit large, and is artifacted due to being a JPEG from Twitter.

    There's nothing to particularly dislike about the image; I find little to be revolted by in it. But, I'm also not motivated to put my name next to its approval.

    Wow, since when was this site so uptight about quality?

  • -2
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    OOZ662
    almost 10 years ago
    [hidden]

    KamiNoKiseki said:

    Wow, since when was this site so uptight about quality?

    I don't necessarily reflect the feelings of all of the moderators and janitors, it's just my take on it.

  • 1
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    FJH
    almost 10 years ago
    [hidden]

    The plan to make the moderator queue process more transparent seems like it tarnished its image more than made it better.

  • -1
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    T34-38
    almost 10 years ago
    [hidden]

    Something is wrong the mods this days... Something is wrong.

  • -1
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    OOZ662
    almost 10 years ago
    [hidden]

    T34/38 said:

    Something is wrong the mods this days... Something is wrong.

    Think about the line that approvers have to walk here. There is no middle of the road where everyone is happy. You have some approvers that approve "too much" that are harassed for "filling the site with trash." You have the others who "have too high standards" that "are too uptight" and "don't save 'good' art." No matter which side one's on, they'll be moaned and groaned about by their specific detractors.

    This is why we don't have one person making all the decisions, both for what images are approved and for what rules of the site should be. Everyone can hop on the forum and voice their praises, their complaints, and best of all, their solutions. For now, I'll stick to the latter side of the line because that's just how I like to operate. If that doesn't end up jiving with the way the site is flowing, my Approver flag can always be removed, and I won't begrudge it.

    As a side thought that I couldn't think of a place to fit in, I had all those reasons to personally not approve it, but someone else did. You won't find me flagging it because the post doesn't break the rules and isn't horrible. It's below my standards and not below someone else's, and that's not a bad thing. That's what makes this site work, so long as it's in at least decent balance.

  • 1
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    T34-38
    almost 10 years ago
    [hidden]

    KamiNoKiseki said:

    Wow, since when was this site so uptight about quality?

    I had the same thing as well. There are a lot of artwork in twitter that is NEVER being upload at all in pixiv. I've seen several artist doing that.

    My aim is to ensure that those artwork will be preserve in here before the artist deletes it or his account disappears. It is just the mods are becoming way to stricter now as if they had anathema on any image in twitter even it is made by a well known artist.

  • -1
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    aimaispice
    almost 10 years ago
    [hidden]

    T34/38 said:

    I had the same thing as well. There are a lot of artwork in twitter that is NEVER being upload at all in pixiv. I've seen several artist doing that.

    My aim is to ensure that those artwork will be preserve in here before the artist deletes it or his account disappears. It is just the mods are becoming way to stricter now as if they had anathema on any image in twitter even it is made by a well known artist.

    At least we're on the same page on the mods and uploading art from Twitter, man.

  • -1
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Terms / Privacy / Upgrade / Contact /