Danbooru
Login Posts Comments Notes Artists Tags Pools Wiki Forum More »
Listing Upload Hot Changes Help

Search

  • Help
guro
scat
furry -rating:g

Artist

  • ? date naoto 96

Copyrights

  • ? kantai collection 533k
  • ? original 1.5M

Characters

  • ? amagi (battlecruiser) (kancolle) 20
  • ? mutsu (kancolle) 5.8k
  • ? nagato (kancolle) 9.8k
  • ? tosa (kancolle) 7

General

  • ? 4girls 136k
  • ? bare shoulders 1.3M
  • ? breasts 4.6M
  • ? crossed arms 112k
  • ? elbow gloves 384k
  • ? gloves 1.8M
  • ? headgear 97k
  • ? large breasts 2.1M
  • ? long hair 5.7M
  • ? multiple girls 2.0M
  • ? panties 776k
  • ? pussy juice 141k
  • ? short hair 2.9M
  • ? side ponytail 223k
  • ? sweat 702k
  • ? thighhighs 1.4M
  • ? underwear 960k

Meta

  • ? commentary request 5.9M
  • ? highres 7.4M
  • ? ↳ absurdres 2.7M

Information

  • ID: 1838381
  • Uploader: Krugger »
  • Date: over 11 years ago
  • Approver: TunerAinee »
  • Size: 2.87 MB .png (3507x2480) »
  • Source: pixiv.net/artworks/46825193 »
  • Rating: Questionable
  • Score: 27
  • Favorites: 42
  • Status: Active

Options

  • Resize to window
  • View smaller
  • View original
  • Find similar
  • Download

History

  • Tags
  • Pools
  • Notes
  • Moderation
  • Commentary
Resized to 24% of original (view original)
nagato, mutsu, amagi, and tosa (original and 1 more) drawn by date_naoto

Artist's commentary

  • Original
  • 【冬コミ】八八艦隊の軍縮条約の作業工程

    火曜日 東地区 "ル" 60a「慟哭のナイトメア」で陸奥ちゃんメインの八八艦隊の薄い本を頒布予定です!よろしくお願いします!

    • ‹ prev Search: tosa_(kancolle) next ›
  • Comments
  • Recommended
  • Loading...

    7HS
    over 11 years ago
    [hidden]

    The nude variation of this image is tagged "Amagi," "Tosa" and "Original Kanmusu" on Pixiv. I think it's using the designs from post #1793773.

    1 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    cd young
    over 11 years ago
    [hidden]

    7HS said:

    The nude variation of this image is tagged "Amagi," "Tosa" and "Original Kanmusu" on Pixiv. I think it's using the designs from post #1793773.

    so Amagi and Tosa are what Akagi and Kaga were originally going to be as battleships?

    -1 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    NWSiaCB
    over 11 years ago
    [hidden]

    Wow. Looks like someone really forgot the anti-aliasing when they used the fill function.

    Why have an image blown up this huge when it doesn't have details fine enough to need this size, and obvious flaws? (Nagato's gloves in particular...)

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Gin95
    over 11 years ago
    [hidden]

    cd_young said:

    so Amagi and Tosa are what Akagi and Kaga were originally going to be as battleships?

    Well, not quite right...
    Amagi and the Tosa were going to be the first ship of their respective class, the second ships are supposed to be Akagi and Kaga respectively. Tosa was cancelled due to washington naval treaty, and was scuttled. Amagi was broken due to great kanto earthquake. Akagi and Kaga converted to Carriers.

    Btw,i wrote this on phone, don't have time to check the source, if i'm wrong feel free to correct me.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Magus
    over 11 years ago
    [hidden]

    Gin95 said:

    Well, not quite right...
    Amagi and the Tosa were going to be the first ship of their respective class, the second ships are supposed to be Akagi and Kaga respectively. Tosa was cancelled due to washington naval treaty, and was scuttled. Amagi was broken due to great kanto earthquake. Akagi and Kaga converted to Carriers.

    Btw,i wrote this on phone, don't have time to check the source, if i'm wrong feel free to correct me.

    And originally it would've been Amagi that was completed as an aircraft carrier. When she wrecked by the Great Kanto Earthquake, the third and fourth ships of the class (Atago and Takao, not to be confused with the later heavy cruisers of the same names) weren't sufficiently far along in construction to substituted for her. This left Japan in a bit of a bind, since the two capital ships allowed for conversion into carriers under the Washington Treaty were allowed to be 6000 tons heavier than other carriers. The IJN was already outraged at being limited to a smaller navy than the US and UK, so there's no way they'd allow the US Navy to get two 33,000 ton carriers while the IJN only got one. But Tosa and Kaga had already been launched, and while their hulls weren't ideal (being shorter and wider than the Amagi class) there weren't any others on hand of sufficient size. So they could pick one to make into a carrier and the other to dispose of, and for whatever reason Kaga was the lucky one. Until Midway at least.

    Honestly, given all the outright cheating Japan later did with regard to treaty compliance, I'm surprised they didn't just build a copy of the converted Akagi and insist that it was Amagi.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link

    Leave a comment

    Terms / Privacy / Upgrade / Contact /