I've corrected it a little. Had to improvise, partly because the grammar of the original text seems somewhat broken (grammatical tenses are mismatched). But, hopefully, the intended meaning is kept intact.
It has the same colours, yes, but I think (besides the classical giant ceremonial sword or whatever) that it also could be a play on Ukraine national flag colours.
I have no idea what kind of legal environment is this, when an acting President appoints an acting attorney general. Or when the participants of peaceful demonstration have been killing our soldiers. And that government, which currently rules our country, stood on Maidan and have been issuing orders to armed groups as to which sotnia should engage in battle and where. Can this kind of environment even be called legal?
Leave a comment