If one of these two is Imizu I might actually...

It just might be...

I've looked at the picture, and I still can' tell which one's Imizu.

Oh man, 2girls... Here we go.

Coga said:

I've looked at the picture, and I still can' tell which one's Imizu.

My money's on the one with the glasses. Just because of the legs.

ThunderBird said:

My money's on the one with the glasses. Just because of the legs.

It might be the one with the short shorts, Imizu is quite the legendary trap after all.

Wait, so if post #1596213 is Imizu-san (as a girl)...

Going to fall back to the trusted if its pretty logic here

Kikimaru said:

Wait, so if post #1596213 is Imizu-san (as a girl)...

Or atleast crossdress...yeah its Imizu-san as a girl

whitebird said:

It might be the one with the short shorts, Imizu is quite the legendary trap after all.

That was my reasoning too. His legs are not those of a man. But it seems I was wrong.

ThunderBird said:

That was my reasoning too. His legs are not those of a man. But it seems I was wrong.

Imizu is Imizu-gender.

Coga said:

I've looked at the picture, and I still can' tell which one's Imizu.

Imizu is the one on the floor, doing the sniffing...

whitebird said:

It just might be...

At this point, I really can't tell if Imizu is a man or a woman. Putting them into a classification of their own seems to be the best case.

whitebird said:

It just might be...

...

So, judging from the conversation here, the 2girls tag should be changed.... Or should it?

Titanzer said:

So, judging from the conversation here, the 2girls tag should be changed.... Or should it?

It should not.
Even if Imizu-san and/or Matori are packing a little something extra, they're both clearly "girls" in this picture.

Kikimaru said:

It should not.
Even if Imizu-san and/or Matori are packing a little something extra, they're both clearly "girls" in this picture.

Not everything is what it seems could be traps or futa since someone mentioned some swelling