I think you know what this means. Besides that part 2 is all uploaded that is.
Format may be changing though (see below)

Why'd it get tagged loli? The artist didn't tag it loli, part 1 was never deemed loli and I've been uploading for 4+ hours without anyone else thinking it's loli.

I find it strange as well, and irritating as now both the original and artist pages are loaded with pages of blank space because of it.

JS2057 said:

I find it strange as well, and irritating as now both the original and artist pages are loaded with pages of blank space because of it.

Will untag & lock.
--
Scratch that, forgot locking is for rating & notes only.

I was irritated by the blank space it would create in the pool. It'd have been odd for whole chunk(s) to be missing to some viewers.
I just didn't want to do it myself, because I know how I get when there's disagreement about loli on Kona and it's not run past mod/equivalent.

Well the translation of the second image of the first part says she is a sixth grader. Pretty sure that counts as loli. Though it's very well drawn and just looking at her image alone you might be able to say otherwise.

Loli is based on the image's appearance, not any outside information.

Arrei said:

Loli is based on the image's appearance, not any outside information.

That makes the tagging of it seem pretty subjective though. I sure wouldn't tag this girl as a loli.

The girl here is a sixth grader according the translation to a related image in part one... so shouldn't the whole set be tagged as loli?

Mollord said:

That makes the tagging of it seem pretty subjective though. I sure wouldn't tag this girl as a loli.

That's why a check thread exists in the forum for borderline cases.

Although there are generally very obvious differences between what passes for loli and what is just flat or small-chested.

Suzuku?

Suzuku?!

No damn it, let her go already!