If you look closely you can see markings on the "bones" and if you look at the top of her arm, you can see some of her skin, and the top of her "bone" looks more like its something shes wearing, rather then her bones (or rather, muscle, as it looks barely like bones at all!).
m0rte said: It looks more like a long glove. You can tell by the markings on her "bones".
I believe he misquoted the saying "having meat on your bones." The point is the arm is skinny to the point of being deformed and strange, not that there's some kind of bone visible.
OOZ662 said: I believe he misquoted the saying "having meat on your bones." The point is the arm is skinny to the point of being deformed and strange, not that there's some kind of bone visible.
Still, it looks OK to me, and besides the rest of the picture (and book) looks good enough, so removing it just cause of one tiny screw up would be counter-productive.
m0rte said: Still, it looks OK to me, and besides the rest of the picture (and book) looks good enough, so removing it just cause of one tiny screw up would be counter-productive.
I feel I can't make the "there are plenty of other images that get removed as part of a set" argument as it's the inverse of the excuse that always gets used to keep images. Still, Danbooru is supposed to be an archive of particularly well-drawn images first and foremost. In the end, it's down to the overseers of the queue.
OOZ662 said: I feel I can't make the "there are plenty of other images that get removed as part of a set" argument as it's the inverse of the excuse that always gets used to keep images. Still, Danbooru is supposed to be an archive of particularly well-drawn images first and foremost. In the end, it's down to the overseers of the queue.
Hence why I flagged it and let the Mod queue handle it.
