Posted under General
This topic has been locked.
BrokenEagle98 said:
What tags were you trying to use? The above error should only occur if an implication relation exists. In other words, there should be an implication
??? -> artist_name. I can't really say more than that without knowing what post you were trying to change, and what tags you were trying to change.
For instance, in post #2969426, the original uploader tagged the image as rentille, and then I changed that to artist:rentille
Ah, I see. That seems to affect the changing of any tag category via the tag box. I'll submit an issue.
Created issue #3477.
Updated
Upload #1691078 - I got an ImageMagick error trying to upload post #2975963 (it went through when I clicked the back button and resubmitted). Scrolling down the uploads page, I see the same error occurred on upload #1691057 and upload #1691072
fossilnix said:
Upload #1691078 - I got an ImageMagick error trying to upload post #2975963 (it went through when I clicked the back button and resubmitted). Scrolling down the uploads page, I see the same error occurred on upload #1691057 and upload #1691072
Pixiv's having some serious problems right now - nothing we can really fix on our end.
This may be more of a question to the devs than an issue, but what kind of impact are the Meltdown and Spectre bugs gonna have on Danbooru server?
They say the fix for Meltdown would inevitably incur a performance degrade, which is especially notable for CPU or filesystem-intensive tasks like DB. (Though it seems Google has some tricks to work around this)
That is, of course, assuming that Danbooru server is running on Intel x86-based CPUs. (Spectre is not even possible to fix with software anyway)
Currently, for larger uploaded image, danbooru would perform thumbnailing algorithm on them. However, sometimes when the image being uploaded is only slightly above the limit, the thumbnail would only reduce the size very slightly, like when the thumbnail is thumbnailed to 94% original size it won't say much bandwidth but require server to compress it and user will have to ask for retransmit the image if they want to get the original image. Would it be possible that if the image is let's say less than 20% larger than the thumbnail size then make the danbooru not to do the action of thumbnail?
WhiteCrow said:
This may be more of a question to the devs than an issue, but what kind of impact are the Meltdown and Spectre bugs gonna have on Danbooru server?
To carry out these attacks the attacker has to be able to run code on the same machine as the victim. This is a concern for sites running on shared or cloud hosting, but Danbooru runs on dedicated servers.
Would it be possible that if the image is let's say less than 20% larger than the thumbnail size then make the danbooru not to do the action of thumbnail?
That's the same thing as making the limit 20% bigger. Whatever the limit is, there will always be cases where an image is just slightly over the limit.
post #2395889, for reference. Really the problem is translators using font sizes that are okay for desktops but way too large for mobile screens. The notes themselves need to be fixed.
So, i'm thinking this is the right topic for this.
Sine the update to D2 i've sometimes gotten New Message toasters, only to go to my inbox and not find anything new.
It still reads "Messages (1)" even then.
Could it be a bug that makes the message invisible?
Or does anyone have any idea why this happens?
evazion said:
That's the same thing as making the limit 20% bigger. Whatever the limit is, there will always be cases where an image is just slightly over the limit.
Not really, because the thumbnail size would not be changed.
So let's say the thumbnail limit size is 800x600 (I don't know the exact value), if you have 801x601 then the image would get thumbnailed to 800*600 which is a waste of thumbnail time
However, if the thumbnail limit is increased to e.g. 1000*800, then an image with dimension of let say 1001x801 would still get thumbnailed to 800x600 and thus it would no longer be a "99% thumbnailed"
c933103 said:
Not really, because the thumbnail size would not be changed.
So let's say the thumbnail limit size is 800x600 (I don't know the exact value), if you have 801x601 then the image would get thumbnailed to 800*600 which is a waste of thumbnail time
However, if the thumbnail limit is increased to e.g. 1000*800, then an image with dimension of let say 1001x801 would still get thumbnailed to 800x600 and thus it would no longer be a "99% thumbnailed"
But why not just make the normal limit 1000*800 then? It makes no sense not to.
Can I ask about the official danbooru bookmarklet here? the batch to danbooru doesn't seems to work on Twitter moment pages like https://twitter.com/i/moments/942325491461058560 , can support on the feature be added to the site?
