Loli/shota check thread.

Athal said:
post #480517

Going by the relative body sizes, it's loli.

post #648278: I don't think that's either implicitly suggestive or explicit in detail enough, so I've gone and removed the tag.

No contest on the rest.

sgcdonmai said:
post #648278: I don't think that's either implicitly suggestive or explicit in detail enough, so I've gone and removed the tag.

Uh, and what about her showing her panties, as well as the open shirt slipping off her shoulder?

The pantyshot I overlooked, due to there being no cameltoe drawn in (which usually happens with such things when the artist intends to titillate).

But wow, the shirt slip completely escaped my notice somehow. Nevermind all that.

What's so bad about the shirt slip?

Puts the suggestiveness level up a few notches. Straw, camel, etc.

We've let the tag slide with more showing though, at least from my perspective. Oh well.

post #651529 What? Seriously, 葉月? I must be missing something.

Question: What is the case of Hikari of Pokemon? Would she be classified as a loli and if so, would the pedophile tag be needed if she is in a yuri pairing with Shirona?

Doesn't Hikari generally have boobs?

Fencedude said:
Doesn't Hikari generally have boobs?

True, but in some images, she is flat chested and with a lolicon appearance.

Then in those cases the image would be tagged loli.

Bastille said:
post #651529 What? Seriously, 葉月? I must be missing something.

Look at their faces? Though that is horribly crappy image anyway.

I'm taking it off. If post #651529 is loli, then I need to start wearing my trousers on my head because it's Opposite Day.

Okay then, it's not. That's why we have this thread.

hidetheunforgiven said:
Question: What is the case of Hikari of Pokemon?

The answer, as always, is "Depends on how the artist draws her."

post #176506

How about post #48403? Do just big eyes and a small-but-not-flat chest a loli make?

(Just why is 'small breasts' aliased to 'flat chest' anyway? I can understand wanting just one tag, but if the tag is meant for non-loli images, wouldn't it be better to have it the other way around, perhaps?)

The size of the girl in comparison to the guy (at least, to me) suggests that the girl is a child. I believe a better argument would be if the image is questionable enough for the loli tag.

Algasir said:
The size of the girl in comparison to the guy (at least, to me) suggests that the girl is a child. I believe a better argument would be if the image is questionable enough for the loli tag.

Looking at it again, I have to agree - the difference in size certainly makes it questionable enough to warrant the tag. I guess this is a subject where one has to err on the side of caution, after all...