Deletion appeal thread

@Sarangpata said:
I did, but it turned out to be the exact same size as the deleted post, only difference is that it's just slightly darker than what I first posted. It's basically a duplicate of a post that shouldn't have been deleted to begin with.

post #2718599 is clearly worse quality that post #2725036. If you zoom in closely you will notice significant differences in smoothing and artifacts. Twitter tends to degrade quality like that. Since we are an archival site we prefer the one with better quality.

Sure it should have been approved a few days ago but how does it help to approve it now? Twitter duplicates are usually only kept if they were approved before the better one is up. It's just a grace amnesty, not something essential. I've uploaded Twitter posts before the Pixiv one and mine got deleted. It's just tough luck I guess. I'll approve it but understand it doesn't have to be

post #2706966

Some Kemono pics I want to give a second chance

post #2675464
post #2667061
post #2667049
post #2670263

NSFW

post #2687917
post #2687919
post #2682414

chinatsu said:

post #2718599 is clearly worse quality that post #2725036. If you zoom in closely you will notice significant differences in smoothing and artifacts. Twitter tends to degrade quality like that. Since we are an archival site we prefer the one with better quality.

Sure it should have been approved a few days ago but how does it help to approve it now? Twitter duplicates are usually only kept if they were approved before the better one is up. It's just a grace amnesty, not something essential. I've uploaded Twitter posts before the Pixiv one and mine got deleted. It's just tough luck I guess. I'll approve it but understand it doesn't have to be

Yeah, I see the quality differences now, and I'll keep in mind using twitter from now on. But I saw no real indication from the deletion notice it was of genuinely lower quality than the pixiv version, hence my confusion. It seemed completely arbitrary.

post #2723066
post #2648762
post #2687947
post #2687946

All these posts are by artists who have had their stuff approved in the past and these posts match their usual quality.

post #2712362
post #2712363

Not seeing issues with either as enough to ruin both of the pictures entirely.

Klaudandus said:

post #2723066
post #2648762
post #2687947
post #2687946

All these posts are by artists who have had their stuff approved in the past and these posts match their usual quality.

I reapproved the first two.

post #792863
Revision of the child post.

wuv_u said:

post #792863
Revision of the child post.

... except it’s not really a revision. Both images are identical except for JPEG artifacts.

kittey said:

... except it’s not really a revision. Both images are identical except for JPEG artifacts.

A revision that adds more JPEG artifacts!

... ehh, I don't know why some artists do that, but just for grace's sake I approved it anyway. Not that it means anything, the parenting should probably go the other way I suppose.

post #2723657
Cover page and everything else in the pool is approved.

post #2724488
post #2690842

post #2721760
post #2725322
post #2725330

post #1453494

Personally it's not good enough for me to approve, but since the child sample was active for so long I decided it's only fair to post it here and see if anyone else will give it a chance.

I don't see anything wrong here at all.
Looks fine, no glaring flaws with anatomy, coloring is nice, style is great.
Please take a second look at this one.
post #2640500
It only got 1 moderator view as well.

This Shoebill pic I think needs another chance

post #2726573

Why was this deleted? Its highres official art for the game.
post #2727317

post #2727614

post #2728287

post #933874

post #2686186

Image was flagged for anatomy, but isn't this is what a typical transformer is shaped like?

It's a robot, not a human after all.

post #2671225
the anatomy is not bad, the coloring is good, it has only been review by one moderator