post #4593802: Can't see a reason it doesn't meet site standards, and I feel not approving it was an oversight.
post #4609753: Please reconsider this post. Quality is not even near poor. There's nothing wrong with it?
Posted under General
This topic has been locked.
post #4593802: Can't see a reason it doesn't meet site standards, and I feel not approving it was an oversight.
post #4609753: Please reconsider this post. Quality is not even near poor. There's nothing wrong with it?
post #4593802: Can't see a reason it doesn't meet site standards, and I feel not approving it was an oversight.
post #3748921
post #3971143
post #3971147: Good sequence
post #4580162
post #538088: Magnificent
post #4514107: this messy style is typical of artist, and it's on same level as their other, approved works.
post #4610742: Previous batch was approved but not these
post #4547379
post #4602750: Can you give this one a chance?
post #4529549: Good, art reconsider approving it
post #4595159: Good art, please reconsider approving it
post #4604916: Please admit this upload.
post #4530671: Official art. "Uncensored" variation compared to the one already approved.
post #3595021: a missed high quality
post #3595024: a missed high quality nude variant of post #3595024
post #4572218
post #4604136: Please re-appeal this, she deserves more attention
post #4604137: Please re-appeal this, you don't get to see demon girls in maid much.
post #4604141: Please re-appeal this, I love fox girls.
post #4614276: How is this poor quality? And why should character or any with scary faces gets dislike?
post #4569536
post #4613058: Art seems solid enough to me, consistent in style with other approved works by the same artist of the same character
