post #4366767: detailed body, neat spin from the original design of the character
Posted under General
This topic has been locked.
post #4366767: detailed body, neat spin from the original design of the character
post #4503999: Why???
post #4451186: The bad anatomy doesn't ruin what is overall a very nice image, of similar quality to many of this artist's approved works
post #4505485: I don't see the 'low quality' here.
post #4506154: Don't see anything wrong with this.
post #4506156: Don't see anything wrong with this.
post #4506163: Don't see anything wrong with this.
post #4506164: Don't see anything wrong with this.
post #4502083: All related posts are unapproved parents/R18 variations of an approved cropped child post.
post #4503619: It is very well drawn and animated, quite fluid, and was well-received with a high score. I believe it's a good enough quality.
post #4507213: It's funny; it's got sex appeal; and it's decently well drawn. I don't know why this isn't approved.
post #4503906: This seems on-par with previously-approved fanart of this character
post #603284: part of a pool
post #626769: part of a pool
post #4506129: Don't see anything wrong with this.
post #4506130: Don't see anything wrong with this.
post #4501752: As far as I understand, the source of this particular version of the picture is the own commisioner.
post #4507131: lewd variation of approved art
post #4507132: lewd variation of approved art
post #4401680: Good quality art, deserves another chance
post #4024079: Quality looks to be about in line with the artist's other work.