BUR #49403 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
nuke pool:Genshin_Impact_-_Ojou-sama_Fashion
Seems like a vague mix of lolita fashion styles.
Posted under General
BUR #49403 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
nuke pool:Genshin_Impact_-_Ojou-sama_Fashion
Seems like a vague mix of lolita fashion styles.
BUR #49404 has been approved by @evazion.
nuke pool:Panty_&_Stocking_with_Garterbelt_-_In-Style_Erotica
Same thing as Panty & Stocking With Garterbelt + official style.
BUR #49405 has been approved by @evazion.
nuke pool:On_Camera
Started out as posts based on post #1762367 (see also topic #11925), became a mix of cellphone photo / fake phone screenshot / viewfinder / recording.
All covered by existing tags: pool:16473 -rogo's_camera_(meme) -fake_phone_screenshot -viewfinder -recording -cellphone_photo
EDIT: made rogo's camera (meme) for the meme template.
BUR #49412 has been approved by @evazion.
nuke pool:7143
(Touhou - Pictures by an unknown Twilight frontier artist)
Covered by artist request. Can always explain under each post the reason but I'll also leave it under this BUR for records sakes
Pictures that were previously posted on the circle's website and were believed to be by alphes, but now believed to possibly been done by another artist from the circle. They're often noted for the curves shown in contrast to most offical touhou art. Once the artist matter is resolved this pool would likely be removed.
NiceLittleDan said:
BUR #49412 has been approved by @evazion.
nuke pool:7143
(Touhou - Pictures by an unknown Twilight frontier artist)
Covered by artist request. Can always explain under each post the reason but I'll also leave it under this BUR for records sakesOriginal Pool Description
Pictures that were previously posted on the circle's website and were believed to be by alphes, but now believed to possibly been done by another artist from the circle. They're often noted for the curves shown in contrast to most offical touhou art. Once the artist matter is resolved this pool would likely be removed.
Should these be at least parented instead? It seems like we'd just be losing information that would be relevant to potentially finding the artist.
WRS said:
BUR #49365 has been rejected.
nuke pool:27179
Just going to go for a straight nuke, I don't think this needs anything special to accompany historical connection. The comments section can be used for interesting factoids like this or not at all. However, I don't think this is the right use of historical connection to begin with at least if I'm understanding the wiki properly, this sounds something more like
real_life_connection/referenceor something else.Meh because this might be a genuinely taggable and interesting concept but I don't have any names to workshop. A BUR should at least get eyes and discussion on this a bit more instead of letting it die after a single reply.
Edit: If it's the umamusume and the racehorse, We do have historical_name_connection which I believe applies there based on its use in kancolle posts featuring the real ship. Not sure what goes for the jocky. But agreed, it should be a taggable concept.
Updated by FubukiKai
FubukiKai said:
Should these be at least parented instead? It seems like we'd just be losing information that would be relevant to potentially finding the artist.
You'd probably need to explain why they're parented in the comments anyway, which is why I said the reason for artist resquest can be left under each post. Regardless, this isn't what pools are for and being a pool for 12 years hasn't exactly helped finding the original artist(s) thus far.
NiceLittleDan said:
You'd probably need to explain why they're parented in the comments anyway, which is why I said the reason for artist resquest can be left under each post. Regardless, this isn't what pools are for and being a pool for 12 years hasn't exactly helped finding the original artist(s) thus far.
Agreed that it doesn't need to be a pool and it's not what pools are for, but just adding artist request will get them lost in the sea of 125k other artist request posts and lose the connection between them. A comment under one post which all the others are parented to makes sense to me.
BUR #49420 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
mass update pool:874 -> food_focus
nuke pool:874
"Food Porn" is literally just the already existing food focus tag. I don't think we need it, for the same reason Scenery Porn is getting the axe.
Knowledge_Seeker said:
BUR #49420 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
mass update pool:874 -> food_focus
nuke pool:874"Food Porn" is literally just the already existing food focus tag. I don't think we need it, for the same reason Scenery Porn is getting the axe.
there's some more literal interpretations of the pool's name that i'm not sure qualify for food focus. post #1224479, post #754344, post #2129104 and so on. may need some gardening first.
wingdings said:
there's some more literal interpretations of the pool's name that i'm not sure qualify for food focus. post #1224479, post #754344, post #2129104 and so on. may need some gardening first.
Crap, didn't see those. Anyway, the answer to all of these is "No", and those are very much part of an equally taggable fetish around sexualizing food. I suggest the tag name "erotic food" that appeal more to that kink (which these posts definitely are).
Knowledge_Seeker said:
BUR #49420 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
mass update pool:874 -> food_focus
nuke pool:874"Food Porn" is literally just the already existing food focus tag. I don't think we need it, for the same reason Scenery Porn is getting the axe.
I don't get why people need to add something detailed as "porn", that's just plain dumb; also not all pornography are classified as "good looking."
Porn means pornography, that's it.
The bulk update request #49405 (forum #393638) has been approved by @evazion.
The bulk update request #49404 (forum #393637) has been approved by @evazion.
The bulk update request #49278 (forum #393114) has been approved by @evazion.
The bulk update request #49412 (forum #393654) has been approved by @evazion.
FubukiKai said:
Should these be at least parented instead? It seems like we'd just be losing information that would be relevant to potentially finding the artist.
I just tagged them as Twilight Frontier. The other posts under that tag weren't credited to any specific artist either.
BUR #49457 has been approved by @evazion.
nuke pool:Expert_Level:_Hatching_(Texture)
Just a handful of posts that someone considered to be "hatching but good".
BUR #49458 has been approved by @evazion.
nuke pool:Expert_Level:_Clothes_Rendering
Just a handful of posts that someone thought were good clothes. Better covered by clothes focus or pool:Exquisite_Clothes.
BUR #49459 has been approved by @evazion.
nuke pool:Expert_Level:_Food_Rendering
As above but with food. Better covered by food focus + realistic.