Upload Feedback Thread - post here if your uploads keep getting deleted

Posted under General

trapster77

trapster77 said:

i know this is a 3rd party source "stitched" "anime screenshot" from e-hentai but it's actually a sample from a shopping page that sells the ova, so it's basically official art (idk if doujinshi ova screenshots get tagged official art). problem is i can't find a more "official" source of the image. the shopping pages i found had a smaller size. i found the same size in a news website but when i compared with the image on ehg i noticed the one on ehg had better quality. basically i'm pretty sure this image was on a shopping page somewhere some day in the past instead of a 3rd party taking screenshots of the ova and stitching them together, i just can't find it and it might not even be online anymore

post #10526635

i found this forum #350732 by NNT saying official stitches are ok anime screenshot, so imo it really should be approved since it's an official stitch

also my pop team epic style post #10548136 got deleted :(

DUDE. someone rejected my appeal on post #10526635 because the ehg gallery had a "video player" out. it's literally from INSIDE the anime! it's in the doujin too! post #10526045. i can't believe this

Updated by trapster77

Reply
Blank User

Xirtr said:

Over half of it is art that has previously been approved (Its children: post #7912498, post #7912465, post #7912416, post #7912087)

None of those were approved. They were uploaded by a Contributor. Contributor users and higher are able to skip the modqueue and do not need their images to be approved.

Is there a rule about posts having too many tags or is there another reason why this was deleted? I am very puzzled why it was deleted.

There is no such rule; the tags are irrelevant for getting your art approved (though you should still add them), so it would have to be for some other reason.

Reply
Xirtr

Blank_User said:

None of those were approved. They were uploaded by a Contributor. Contributor users and higher are able to skip the modqueue and do not need their images to be approved.

There is no such rule; the tags are irrelevant for getting your art approved (though you should still add them), so it would have to be for some other reason.

Fine I was wrong there, but I have posted other collections from this artist and all of them were approved: post #10514410, post #10517668, post #10517743, post #10523521

Some of those also contain art that was posted by contributors alongside new art just like the deleted post.
So why was post #10554205 deleted if all of those were approved?

Reply
Xirtr

spamerino111 said:

post #10555332
parent post variant was approved but this one not
"Posts are approved on their own merits. That includes variants."
a raised head, raised tail and open mouth cant possibly make this one so much worse

I concur with you.

Reply
Meowscar64

Two of my posts got deleted because some approves claim decensors are against the rules. Are they? Where does it say that?

In the upload rules, this statement is written about prohibited content: "Third-party edits that substantially alter the content of the image, such as nude filters, headshops, fake translations, or meme or joke edits."

No mentions of decensored.

Then in the decensored definition it states "All decensored posts should have the original as its parent. In addition, 'decensored' is different from both nude filter and uncensored." with nude filter being explicitly stated to be prohibited. Seems to me like a line is drawn in the sand to differentiate these two.

To boot there are a bunch of approved decensored posts. Was it a past rule that they were decensored and that's where the belief comes from or...? I see that third party edits are/can be borderline but that's a whole different ballpark from rulebreaking.

Check the art in question too, high quality unintrusive changes that just take shitty censors away. Someone clarify pls.
post #10558515
post #10558521

Reply
1 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 717