What is wrong with post #10467292? It might not be the most creative work, but quality wise it looks fine to me. Did i miss something?
Posted under General
What is wrong with post #10467292? It might not be the most creative work, but quality wise it looks fine to me. Did i miss something?
post #10468636
alternate version of the image it is parented to which has been approved
Why was this post approved: post #10457136 but this one was not post #10463312?
Both are animation done by the same artist in the same style about the same topic (yu-gi-oh), so I dont understand why one was approved and the other was not.
Is there some difference with the second one that I am not noticing that makes it a lower quality post compared to the first one? I would really like to know.
Why were these 2 deleted, they're easily up to the quality of the artist's approved works, the first especially
Updated by user 1432016
post #10465012
Could I ask why was this unapproved/removed without a word or a reason from 12 people?
Hi, any feedback on why this post wasn't approved? Please give it a second chance.
post #7227980
Updated by SidBarrett
active parent and siblings
Updated by user 1435841
StarfishAtLarge said:
This feels like job hunting. Everyone declining your submission and no one explaining why.
IKR?
Like, what did I do wrong?
Updated by unrecognized taste
StarfishAtLarge said:
This feels like job hunting. Everyone declining your submission and no one explaining why.
Approvers will look through thousands of posts per day (approver:any age:<24h gives a good baseline with approved posts). Giving a detailed rejection message is entirely unfeasible.
unrecognized_taste said:
IKR?
Like, what did I do wrong?
I don't think you did anything wrong per-se, but it would be in your benefit to have a look through the posts in approver:any, to see the types of posts that do end up approved.
unrecognized_taste said:
13 approvers and none of them said yes.
This is getting completely ridiculous.
This thread isn't for whining, it's for asking for (and listening to) feedback. Stop doing the former.
unrecognized_taste said:
IKR?
Like, what did I do wrong?
I understand it's frustrating, but your repeated complaints in this thread are getting pretty annoying.
Looking at your deleted posts in specific, it looks like there's a lot of flat color and sketch images, which are often on the borderline of the site's quality standard. In particular, post #10475660 looks quite beginner - looking at the artist's pixiv, their works have gotten a lot better in the two years since they drew that! The middle panel of post #10411501 is either unfinished or stylistically far too "sketchy" given the context.
The system is definitely luck-based, but I personally find your deleted uploads to not have been "unlucky" but rather just to have been... not good. Maybe not that bad, but certainly what the kids would call "mid", and that sort of thing rarely gets approved.
Legendliner said:
post #10285804
post #9649023
post #9531397
post #9594319
post #8801504
post #8390173
post #10285804 - bad perspective, look at those hands!
post #9649023 - same, but on the feet
post #9531397 - Face looks weird, and the breasts are lopsided in a way that looks unintentional. Maybe not unacceptable, but simple background images tend to have less wiggle room on "looks weird" when it comes to approvals. post #9788791 has the same face issues, but less extreme, with more detailed shading and a background, which is probably why it was approved but this wasn't.
post #9594319 - Not really sure? Head proportions look weird again but it's more stylized so I'd forgive that more than for the previous post. Maybe just that combined with sample watermark and second-party source scared the approvers off.
post #8801504 - The hand holding the sword doesn't look great, but I might have approved this if I was an approver and I saw it. Definitely a borderline case.
post #8390173 - bad perspective on the right arm and hand (her right, viewer's left side)
Overall, a few bad ones and a few borderline ones.
Updated by trainingslip6
SidBarrett said:
Hi, any feedback on why these posts weren't approved? Please give a second chance:
post #6268502
post #6622149
post #7227980
#6268502 - Her left hand has two pinkies instead of a thumb, and her right hand is much bigger than her left and honestly looks kind of grotesque. That phone is also significantly larger than the real-life equivalent. I'm not familiar with the character, if it's supposed to be like that you could probably appeal.
#6622149 - Uninteresting screenshot redraw, and the perspective gets a bit wonky with the eyes.
#7227980 - I'm not really familiar with this artstyle, and I imagine most approvers aren't either. But I think it's good. It reminds me of Disco Elysium. I wonder if it's just approvers not being confident enough to sign off on it.
Strike1996 said:
It kind of looks like her spine's broken? The perspective is all wonky in ways I can't quite describe with words.
Space_Force_Detective said:
Why were these 2 deleted, they're easily up to the quality of the artist's approved works, the first especially
Maybe it's considered off-topic western art? This doesn't really look anime or anime-inspired to me. But I don't really know.
nyatbn said:
What is wrong with post #10467292? It might not be the most creative work, but quality wise it looks fine to me. Did i miss something?
The perspective is a bit ambiguous here but either her right leg has two knees / bends like it's made of jello, or her right leg is somewhat bigger than her left and they intersect with each other in physically impossible ways. Neither is great anatomy, and the neck/shoulder area is a bit questionable too.
Redgalt said:
post #10468636
alternate version of the image it is parented to which has been approved
I don't get why the necklace is under her top, that's a bit weird isn't it?
Updated by trainingslip6