Posted under General
The second one has perspective problems; her upper looks detached from her lower body.
The first one has really bad and blocky hand, digits are completely misplaced, right shoulder is really badly drawn.
The other two are just bad and the very last one has extremely bad anatomy...
post #2686151
The child (post #2682538) is larger than the image I post, but it has smaller filesize.
I thought the child, which file extention is .jpg, was poorly compressed
and it's good to post the image from pixiv, which was lossless-compressed.
Toskana said:
The hands aren't even the worst problem here imo.
The first one has notable uneven eyes (The left iris is much smaller than the right one) and the whole left cheek looks bigger than the other one.The second one has notable uneven breasts and the right one looks more like a balloon.
There might be other issues, but that's the problems I saw on first sight.
uneven iris? the whole left cheek looks bigger than the other one.? this post #2692338 has same thing, so can we delete too?
uneven breasts? who do you mean mashu or gudako? if mashu she is slipped down, like ballon? for me oppai mashu category medium - larger. if gudako, I don't know where the reference of that pose? and for boob she has smaller than mashu but not even smaller as saber
I'd like to know why so many didn't like the Commission i had made by Cresentia and was given rights to post where i saw fit. If its just because it was a porn piece and you didnt see it needed on the site i understand but i would like to know whats up other then that.
post #2690142
Kinda curious as to what lead this to this one's deletion given that the other images from this book of very similar quality to this one were approved. Did I miss some sort of anatomical error or something else glaringly obvious that I didn't notice that made it not up to snuff?
Omegamagnum said:
post #2690142
Kinda curious as to what lead this to this one's deletion given that the other images from this book of very similar quality to this one were approved. Did I miss some sort of anatomical error or something else glaringly obvious that I didn't notice that made it not up to snuff?
Looks fine to me -- I've been skimming through the queue less frequently and more quickly, so there's decent chance that I miss these kinds of things.
Explicit images typically have a tougher time getting approved to begin with, so to get them approved you might have to appeal for them a bit harder than q or s images.
Is there something wrong with this or is there just a lack of active general approvers still?
post #2691287
post #2646955
Just curious on some feedback here, figure it can't hurt.
vivoleko01 said:
I'm gonna guess by how simplistic the lineart is and how flat the coloring is. It's not gonna get a lot of approvers attention and they're gonna dismiss it as another low quality drawing by some newbie to drawing.
Chimera99 said:
Kantai
Safe
Its probably got deleted only because its vore.
Adding to the core, Bismark's face also looks a little derpy and I can't really tell if her back is at an arch or her belly is swelling up.
Omegamagnum said:
post #2691287
post #2646955
Just curious on some feedback here, figure it can't hurt.
What I can say about both of them are the legs. They look kind of big for their size and from the perspective given.
Kikimaru said:
I'm going to see if I can stay at 0.00 post confidence for 2 months.
Yay.
You forgot your '/s'
Anyways, if you wanted brief feedback, most of your uploads are depressingly meh quality that seem to push themselves on fetish or copyright alone. You just don't upload good art consistently.
The approvers have changed since both NOOU and Provence left, so if before it was better before when they were around, then you just have to adapt to newer standards. That's really all that I can say.
Mikaeri said:
that seem to push themselves on fetish or copyright alone
This is my primary gripe with content posted here. The shear amounts of depressingly boring and pandering content that amounts to character spamming. Every half-way decent rendition of a character does not have a place here. More often than not they're in simplistic poses and mimic closely the original characters as they appear in their manga or anime. This is why a character that seems drawn in an acceptable manner but with little more is often rejected; notice people usually aren't petitioning original artworks here but rather ones from copyrights.
It's a good rule of thumb to upload art that you like, not art of fetishes or characters that you like. And as a fan of a particular fetish or character it seems intuitive to me you'd want to see the best content of it rather than mediocre. There isn't a problem per se with uploading your favorite characters it's a big problem if that in itself is the motivating factor.
For people who just want to see their waifus I recommend browsing the character tag on Pixiv or looking through /a/ or /c/ threads made for the copyright and joining in on the spam-fest-argument over who is best girl. Tumblr is another good place for this, as well as other boorus. I see Danbooru as a high quality artworks archive, not a warehouse for interests fandom. I don't suggest anyone stops uploading but rather be more scrutinizing, and to keep the waifu and fetish dumps to boards that were made for them.
post #2639670
post #2639671
post #2639674
post #2643024
All four of these are consistent with the artist's style, and have nothing that actually ruins the artwork outright (given the user often flagged posts for their own reasons). Also, they were only reviewed by one moderator after being flagged.
Really my post was very much liked it seems but you guys dont even know what art is no matter if its NSFW or SFW, I think i am done with your site because literally everything is very bland or boring to look at. I have no clue why you all think you are so above uploads that you think you can be art snobs.
I literally have no clue why you decided this wasn't worth uploading and you seemed to have ignored my last post i had. So obviously you dont really care to be a human being toward me either.
Apollyon said:
post #2639670
post #2639671
post #2639674
post #2643024All four of these are consistent with the artist's style, and have nothing that actually ruins the artwork outright (given the user often flagged posts for their own reasons). Also, they were only reviewed by one moderator after being flagged.
Ah, right, those. As for the reviewed by one moderator thing I believe that was an error on the server's part, which should already be fixed. Well, they're certainly very good artworks (and at the worst would necessitate a bad anatomy tag).
Kikimaru said:
I upload based on artist, more often than not.
Other times, yes I'll look for an under represented character/copyright.However, even posts that hit +15 score/+25 favorites get lost, and i just don't get it.
Major complaint then -- you need to pick better/more consistent artists and also elevate your standard of quality for any uploaded work, regardless of copyright, character or fetish. "Underrepresentation" isn't a problem either -- you can't just force a copyright/character's popularity just by uploading all kinds of 'meh' stuff that not much people will like. If a character/copyright becomes popular, then they become popular. That's it. There are better ways to bolster their popularity than to post here in an attempt to get other artists' attention. See chinatsu's comment above.
Hell, my favorite light novel of all time is severely "underrepresented" (< 30 posts, most of which are novel illustrations), but I don't go out and upload literally everything half-decent on pixiv for it. And just as chinatsu said, if you like a copyright/character that's underrepresented, it's counter-intuitive that you dilute that copyright/character's works by uploading low-tier art. Great art inspires copycats, after all.
As for the latter part, sure some posts will get a fairly high score or high favorites (which suggests there's something to like about an image) but just because an image is popular doesn't always mean it's good. You can bring it up in the deletion appeals thread and it might waver someone's opinions but if a critical error is present or the overall quality is just 'meh', then there's little chance of it being forgiven.
Larkane said:
Really my post was very much liked it seems but you guys dont even know what art is no matter if its NSFW or SFW, I think i am done with your site because literally everything is very bland or boring to look at. I have no clue why you all think you are so above uploads that you think you can be art snobs.
I literally have no clue why you decided this wasn't worth uploading and you seemed to have ignored my last post i had. So obviously you dont really care to be a human being toward me either.
Good to know. Don't let the door hit you on the way out.
Updated by .grey
