What's wrong with this ?
Posted under General
What's wrong with this ?
Hoshizoraa said:
Heya 👋. If its alright, can I ask if there was a specific reason for post #8528299 being unapproved?(As I personally believe its of high quality)
There was a low amount of reviews, but also, bad anatomy
May I at least know the reason why my post got deleted ?
post #8529325
post #8529385
post #8529417
Why were these deleted?
Hi, any feedback on why these posts weren't approved? Please give a second chance.
post #6337912
post #6310119
Updated by SidBarrett
SidBarrett said:
Hi, any feedback on why these posts weren't approved?
post #6337912
This one probably for quality. It looks lower quality than the other works from the artist.
post #8534241 Another rare Youmu-kun deletion. Anything wrong with this one in particular or just another victim of the holiday season queue?
Updated by NiceLittleDan
Long time no see thread. How have you been? Anyway curious why these four posts weren't approved. Cheers
post #8534535
post #8534630
post #8534739
post #8534791
only checked by 5 approvers
post #8535681
What's wrong with these images?
post #6574383
post #8509377
post #8434169
post #8424228
post #3267594
Alto1867 said:
May I at least know the reason why my post got deleted ?
Like the other post that was deleted; maybe the body portions/colouring putting some approvers off?
Emperorlulu said:
post #8529325
post #8529385
post #8529417Why were these deleted?
Explicit art is usually judged using a higher set of standards, so I'm assuming a number of approvers didn't see them at that standard.
waterflame said:
Long time no see thread. How have you been? Anyway curious why these four posts weren't approved. Cheers
post #8534535
post #8534630
post #8534739
post #8534791
Most of them had a low number of approvers, but post #8534739 has some issues with quality, like Observer's arms looking off.
NoIdea4GoodName said:
Like the other post that was deleted; maybe the body portions/colouring putting some approvers off?
Explicit art is usually judged using a higher set of standards, so I'm assuming a number of approvers didn't see them at that standard.
Most of them had a low number of approvers, but post #8534739 has some issues with quality, like Observer's arms looking off.
Ah okay
So the coloring and the body anatomy doesn't match I take it. Not sure if I understand but fair enough
Initial upload and appeal were rejected. Anything stand out here? Not sure what I might've missed against it.
I appealed this, and the only feedback I got was that it's "medicore." Would it hurt to be a bit more specific? If the quality isn't good enough, I totally understand, I just want to know what the issue with it is so I can avoid making similar mistakes with future uploads.
BKaz20 said:
I appealed this, and the only feedback I got was that it's "medicore." Would it hurt to be a bit more specific? If the quality isn't good enough, I totally understand, I just want to know what the issue with it is so I can avoid making similar mistakes with future uploads.
I feel that a simple style like that can work but it's harder. Personally, if you're gonna have proportions like that then the rest of it needs to pop more. Brighter colours, shine etc. Aside from that, the proportions on the legs look off to the rest of the body and generally it is lower quality than Danbooru's standards imo.
post #8520960 Uhm...
post #8528333
Need some feedback here.
PlasmaSnake said:
post #8528333
Need some feedback here.
Low amount of reviews + huge anatomy issues on the girl's torso
BKaz20 said:
I appealed this, and the only feedback I got was that it's "medicore." Would it hurt to be a bit more specific? If the quality isn't good enough, I totally understand, I just want to know what the issue with it is so I can avoid making similar mistakes with future uploads.
I wouldn't call it "mediocre" but it's still quite amateurish in a lot of ways, it has to do with the overall look of the whole piece, not helped by unremarkable coloring and wonky anatomy
WRS said:
Initial upload and appeal were rejected. Anything stand out here? Not sure what I might've missed against it.
May be the high contrast airbrush abuse factors in, and there's also the arm a tad too thin compared to the torso
SidBarrett said:
Hi, any feedback on why these posts weren't approved? Please give a second chance.
post #8088983
post #6337912
post #6310119
all low quality
Back again with fun variant issues. post #8514543 the only change between this and the parent (and sibling) is the facial expression. Unless that's enough to disqualify it then idk why it's not been approved so far even upon appeal.
Updated by NiceLittleDan
