Can I get some feedback on these two images? Are they too rough looking?
These two images has since then been deleted. I'd really like some feedback on them, since I want to know whether I should bother uploading more images from this artist. If his style isn't the problem, I would like to know what I should be looking for in his pieces.
Edit: I've also noticed that most of the previous uploads of this artist's works has also been deleted, so please let me know if there's some taboo or controversy about this artist.
These two images has since then been deleted. I'd really like some feedback on them, since I want to know whether I should bother uploading more images from this artist. If his style isn't the problem, I would like to know what I should be looking for in his pieces.
Edit: I've also noticed that most of the previous uploads of this artist's works has also been deleted, so please let me know if there's some taboo or controversy about this artist.
In my opinion, those artworks by this artist are just not really well drawn. Way to sketchy and nothing that makes it worthy to approve it. I think that most approvers don´t like this artstyle and won´t approve it, so I wouldn´t recommend to upload any more of this. But some of his images are approved, so I think you have to be lucky and hope that one approver likes this stuff, when you upload more of this.
Some of those images weren´t approved but uploaded by an unrestricted User. post #3728482 has a weirdly shaped lower body, like, I think, those legs shouldn´t bent like that and her lower areas just dont look as good as like post #3719060.
post #3572249post #3566187 have poor quality. Just look at those breasts and (large) nipples. Most approvers don´t like nsfw stuff like that, so they won´t approve it. And post #3533268 is the same. Her body looks fine and nice, but the nsfw overall isn´t so nice at all. Mostly the sketchy pubic hair and the use of to much cum here. I think without the body of the boy it would have been approved.
When the notification says that an image has been reviewed by 11 approvers, does that mean 11 mods have opened opened the image and looked at it or could approving/passing over be done after just looking at the thumbnail?
When the notification says that an image has been reviewed by 11 approvers, does that mean 11 mods have opened opened the image and looked at it or could approving/passing over be done after just looking at the thumbnail?
We can do it by looking only by thumbnail in the mod queue. But you can also approve it by open the image itself. It depends on the person. For me if the post looks too shitty, not my taste/interest I don't even bother to open the post to look it closer. Most of the time there are more than 11 approvers that looked at the post, it only means 11 approvers have bothered to press the "no interest" button.
On Danbooru it´s no argument to say, that your stuff should be approved, because something else is worse. If you think that these other three are just as yours, you should flag it.
post #3572249post #3566187 have poor quality. Just look at those breasts and (large) nipples. Most approvers don´t like nsfw stuff like that, so they won´t approve it.
With standards like these, I imagine you're in favor of flagging and deleting ~50% of the content on this website?
#1 look okay to me, maybe their face was a turn off #2 translation doesn´t mean something gets approved (just look how many translated images got deleted) In my opinion the nsfw could be a let down for approvers, but the image itself looks okay #3 way to weird. Focus on her vagina is weird, his face is weirdly drawn and her body looks just bad, like her upper body kinda long while her legs bent in a weird angle I think
Some of those images weren´t approved but uploaded by an unrestricted User. post #3728482 has a weirdly shaped lower body, like, I think, those legs shouldn´t bent like that and her lower areas just dont look as good as like post #3719060.
pretty sure those "bent" are to empashize the thickness of her thighs, just like post #3646218 and post #3448673
most of artist's work have similar's big breasts and implied large nipples since they are inverted like post #2785743
and post #3667679 also has those larege nipples yet it was approved?
And post #3533268 is the same. Her body looks fine and nice, but the nsfw overall isn´t so nice at all. Mostly the sketchy pubic hair and the use of to much cum here. I think without the body of the boy it would have been approved.
With standards like these, I imagine you're in favor of flagging and deleting ~50% of the content on this website?
pretty sure there's subjectivity and bias from mods here from what he said here, "Most approvers don´t like nsfw stuff like that, so they won´t approve it." the question is, why?
All of the posts you linked here, except post #3646218, were uploaded by unrestriced users. They don´t need to be approved, so no approver needs to check it. You, on the other hand, have to rely on approvers, who like the stuff you uploaded here. I´m sorry that I can´t help you with that, but I would recommend you to appeal your stuff, so maybe someone will approve it, if they think it´s good.
pretty sure there's subjectivity and bias from mods here from what he said here, "Most approvers don´t like nsfw stuff like that, so they won´t approve it." the question is, why?
Just saying, if anyone happens to flag the majority these images I can almost assure you that they will be deleted. Images look whack to say the least.
"They" is the top admin and owner of the site. Your post is low quality and off-topic. See the ToS and howto:upload, assuming you want to continue to participate on the site.
"They" is the top admin and owner of the site. Your post is low quality and off-topic. See the ToS and howto:upload, assuming you want to continue to participate on the site.
I don't care. My post is made by me and that's final.
I don't care. My post is made by me and that's final.
A few reasons why it was deleted: It's off-topic, it has low quality and it's a self-upload. Especially self-uploads are discouraged on here. You should use pixiv or deviantart, if you want to share your art with others. Most self-uploads get deleted.
I don't care. My post is made by me and that's final.
That doesn't give you anything to stand on. No one cares if it's "About a rocket"(Seriously what kind of argument even is this), if it's off-topic and a self-upload, or both in this case. There are other websites specifically for that kind of stuff, this is not one of them. The fact you already uploaded it to Furaffinity means you're well aware of that already.
Hello there. I noticed there's a significant decline in approvals for me these past few days, could it be because of the current circumstances worldwide or is it something else? Only have seen two approvers on my posts and the deleted ones say 8 approvers instead of the usual 10+. I might need to stop uploading because my limit is getting worrisome (my current uploads aren't too encouraging)
Regardless, I'd like some feedback on these posts if possible. Thank you.