Upload Feedback Thread - post here if your uploads keep getting deleted

Posted under General

retrospectrum said:

still wondering why are these posts aren't approved
post #3783330
post #3783314
post #3728482
post #3783347
post #3566187
post #3533268
post #3572249
post #3680391

Most of them have bad anatomy or a bad perspective, like post #3783330 or post #3728482.

retrospectrum said:

especially these since they're just another artist's upload to twitter
post #3128607
post #3509314
post #3125543

Twitter uploads won´t be approved, if a better quality post is already up. And most of the time it´s Pixiv > Twitter.

speedstriker said:

post #3786723
post #3786714

Can I get some feedback on these two images? Are they too rough looking?

These two images has since then been deleted. I'd really like some feedback on them, since I want to know whether I should bother uploading more images from this artist. If his style isn't the problem, I would like to know what I should be looking for in his pieces.

Edit: I've also noticed that most of the previous uploads of this artist's works has also been deleted, so please let me know if there's some taboo or controversy about this artist.

speedstriker said:
post #3786723
post #3786714

These two images has since then been deleted. I'd really like some feedback on them, since I want to know whether I should bother uploading more images from this artist. If his style isn't the problem, I would like to know what I should be looking for in his pieces.

Edit: I've also noticed that most of the previous uploads of this artist's works has also been deleted, so please let me know if there's some taboo or controversy about this artist.

In my opinion, those artworks by this artist are just not really well drawn. Way to sketchy and nothing that makes it worthy to approve it. I think that most approvers don´t like this artstyle and won´t approve it, so I wouldn´t recommend to upload any more of this. But some of his images are approved, so I think you have to be lucky and hope that one approver likes this stuff, when you upload more of this.

retrospectrum said:
but most of the artist's works have similar angle like post #3730424 post #3719060 and post #3646218

so why was post #3728482 not approved?

and how about
post #3566187
post #3533268
and post #3572249 ?

Some of those images weren´t approved but uploaded by an unrestricted User. post #3728482 has a weirdly shaped lower body, like, I think, those legs shouldn´t bent like that and her lower areas just dont look as good as like post #3719060.

post #3572249 post #3566187 have poor quality. Just look at those breasts and (large) nipples. Most approvers don´t like nsfw stuff like that, so they won´t approve it.
And post #3533268 is the same. Her body looks fine and nice, but the nsfw overall isn´t so nice at all. Mostly the sketchy pubic hair and the use of to much cum here. I think without the body of the boy it would have been approved.

Updated by Nacha

Guaro1238

When the notification says that an image has been reviewed by 11 approvers, does that mean 11 mods have opened opened the image and looked at it or could approving/passing over be done after just looking at the thumbnail?

speedstriker said:

When the notification says that an image has been reviewed by 11 approvers, does that mean 11 mods have opened opened the image and looked at it or could approving/passing over be done after just looking at the thumbnail?

We can do it by looking only by thumbnail in the mod queue. But you can also approve it by open the image itself. It depends on the person. For me if the post looks too shitty, not my taste/interest I don't even bother to open the post to look it closer. Most of the time there are more than 11 approvers that looked at the post, it only means 11 approvers have bothered to press the "no interest" button.

Guaro1238 said:

On Danbooru it´s no argument to say, that your stuff should be approved, because something else is worse. If you think that these other three are just as yours, you should flag it.

Guaro1238 said:

Most of them have bad anatomy or a bad perspective, like post #3783330 or post #3728482.

Guaro1238 said:

post #3572249 post #3566187 have poor quality. Just look at those breasts and (large) nipples. Most approvers don´t like nsfw stuff like that, so they won´t approve it.

With standards like these, I imagine you're in favor of flagging and deleting ~50% of the content on this website?

solonimbus said:

This thread isn´t here to talk about preferences of other users. Please only post something you want feedback for or if you want to give feedback.

Chimera99 said:

post #3763648

post #3786931 (this one already been translated)

post #3787266

#1 look okay to me, maybe their face was a turn off
#2 translation doesn´t mean something gets approved (just look how many translated images got deleted) In my opinion the nsfw could be a let down for approvers, but the image itself looks okay
#3 way to weird. Focus on her vagina is weird, his face is weirdly drawn and her body looks just bad, like her upper body kinda long while her legs bent in a weird angle I think

Updated by Nacha

Guaro1238 said:

Some of those images weren´t approved but uploaded by an unrestricted User. post #3728482 has a weirdly shaped lower body, like, I think, those legs shouldn´t bent like that and her lower areas just dont look as good as like post #3719060.

pretty sure those "bent" are to empashize the thickness of her thighs, just like post #3646218 and post #3448673

post #3572249 post #3566187 have poor quality. Just look at those breasts and (large) nipples.

most of artist's work have similar's big breasts and implied large nipples since they are inverted like post #2785743

and post #3667679 also has those larege nipples yet it was approved?

And post #3533268 is the same. Her body looks fine and nice, but the nsfw overall isn´t so nice at all. Mostly the sketchy pubic hair and the use of to much cum here. I think without the body of the boy it would have been approved.

but it was no different than post #3572738 , post #3572738 , post #3572727, post #3572740 ?

solonimbus said:

With standards like these, I imagine you're in favor of flagging and deleting ~50% of the content on this website?

pretty sure there's subjectivity and bias from mods here from what he said here, "Most approvers don´t like nsfw stuff like that, so they won´t approve it."
the question is, why?

retrospectrum said:

pretty sure those "bent" are to empashize the thickness of her thighs, just like post #3646218 and post #3448673

most of artist's work have similar's big breasts and implied large nipples since they are inverted like post #2785743

and post #3667679 also has those larege nipples yet it was approved?

but it was no different than post #3572738 , post #3572738 , post #3572727, post #3572740 ?

All of the posts you linked here, except post #3646218, were uploaded by unrestriced users. They don´t need to be approved, so no approver needs to check it. You, on the other hand, have to rely on approvers, who like the stuff you uploaded here. I´m sorry that I can´t help you with that, but I would recommend you to appeal your stuff, so maybe someone will approve it, if they think it´s good.

retrospectrum said:

pretty sure those "bent" are to empashize the thickness of her thighs, just like post #3646218 and post #3448673

most of artist's work have similar's big breasts and implied large nipples since they are inverted like post #2785743

and post #3667679 also has those larege nipples yet it was approved?

but it was no different than post #3572738 , post #3572738 , post #3572727, post #3572740 ?

pretty sure there's subjectivity and bias from mods here from what he said here, "Most approvers don´t like nsfw stuff like that, so they won´t approve it."
the question is, why?

Just saying, if anyone happens to flag the majority these images I can almost assure you that they will be deleted. Images look whack to say the least.

user_723135 said:

I don't care. My post is made by me and that's final.

A few reasons why it was deleted: It's off-topic, it has low quality and it's a self-upload.
Especially self-uploads are discouraged on here. You should use pixiv or deviantart, if you want to share your art with others. Most self-uploads get deleted.

user_723135 said:

I don't care. My post is made by me and that's final.

That doesn't give you anything to stand on. No one cares if it's "About a rocket"(Seriously what kind of argument even is this), if it's off-topic and a self-upload, or both in this case. There are other websites specifically for that kind of stuff, this is not one of them. The fact you already uploaded it to Furaffinity means you're well aware of that already.

Hello there. I noticed there's a significant decline in approvals for me these past few days, could it be because of the current circumstances worldwide or is it something else? Only have seen two approvers on my posts and the deleted ones say 8 approvers instead of the usual 10+. I might need to stop uploading because my limit is getting worrisome (my current uploads aren't too encouraging)

Regardless, I'd like some feedback on these posts if possible. Thank you.

post #3818356
post #3818341
post #3820491
post #3820523
post #3818398
post #3818404
post #3818329
post #3818293

Updated by Admiral Pectoral