Tag implication: censor_tail -> censored
Reason:
It's a form of censorship. Compare the existing implication heart_censor -> censored.
EDIT:
(Fixing a mistake: I said "heart_tail -> censored".)
Updated by Rampardos
Posted under General
Tag implication: censor_tail -> censored
Reason:
It's a form of censorship. Compare the existing implication heart_censor -> censored.
EDIT:
(Fixing a mistake: I said "heart_tail -> censored".)
Updated by Rampardos
Censor tail is just a bad name.
post #336284 is not censored, it's covering_crotch and covering_breasts.
BTW, you got your heart_tail implication wrong.
EDIT: The same applies to censor wings. It isn't censoring if a character uses his/her limbs (prehensile appendages) to cover his/her genitalia.
Updated
censor_hair says:
Hair positioned so that it covers the nipples or the crotch.
Replace hair with tail/wings.
What's wrong with that?
It would have to be prehensile_hair to be comparable to tails and wings.
It's just a weird grey area for terminology. I don't think anyone would tag an image of someone covering themselves as censored. When I think of something being censored, I think of it being censored through artificial means.
Censor hair is a little different since a person isn't necessarily actively covering themselves with their hair, and is actually a common tool artists use to censor a woman who is naked.