Tag Implication: pov_feeding -> pov feeding

Implicating pov_feeding -> pov and feeding.

Reason: It's these two at the same time. The slightly confusing topic title was an attempt at putting two tags in one box.

feeding, sure. pov, no. See forum #51175 for my take on the matter.

I support adding pov since its in the name. Its basically a combination tag.

We have looking at viewer, so how about turning pov feeding into feeding viewer?

Anelaid said:
I support adding pov since its in the name. Its basically a combination tag.

That's not a reason, and you should know by now that combination tags are frowned upon.

Evangeline_A.K._McDowell said:
We have looking at viewer, so how about turning pov feeding into feeding viewer?

Might as well, just so we can stop people suggesting implicating it to pov.

My point is that it is a combination tag and it doesn't make sense if its called pov_feeding that it doesn't have pov.

I support Eva's solution since it deals with both problems.

Evangeline_A.K._McDowell said:
We have looking at viewer, so how about turning pov feeding into feeding viewer?

My only concern with this is that feeding_viewer suggests that the character is the one feeding the viewer. Some pov_feeding images have it the other way around.

Split it rather than move it completely, pov requires a point of reference and a hand reaching towards a character is a point of reference.

Now I'm wondering if feeding pov and feeding looking_at_viewer don't already cover both instances.

I'm going to bump this thread because it was recently brought up. I'd like to ask why we can't simply use the tags feeding the viewer and fed by viewer.