Posted under General
Is there a real purpose for putting this tag on an image that was simply drawn/posted/whatever on Drawr, but doesn't reference it?
I just find the practice similar to tagging an image pixiv just because it was posted on Pixiv, or photoshop just because it was drawn in Photoshop, neither of which we do.
Updated by Cyberia-Mix
I want to say they look different from regular oekaki pictures, mostly from the typical thin black lineart the latter ones have, but it's not always the case so I dunno.
I'd think it's worth keeping them apart even if there are a few exceptions that are impossible to distinguish without the source / media data.
However I have a hard time telling drawr and tegaki pictures apart, but merging them under something new like soft_oekaki (this is totally made up) might be a bit too random.
e: I just noticed that drawr lets you watch how the images were drawn, which is extremely valuable. I'd think it makes them worth keeping their own tag.
Uploaders need to replace the source link with the page id though.
Updated
