Implicate =_= -> Closed_eyes

Implicate =_= -> closed_eyes

Reason: My understanding of =_= is that its a specific variant of closed_eyes, but I'm not sure if that is exactly the case. I couldn't find anything about this tag minus the wiki, so if it is involving the eyes being closed, should it be implicated to closed_eyes?

I'm going to say no, I have a reason but I can't articulate it.

No.

A smiley that is used to represent a face with squinted eyes (mouth shape is often varied).

Whatever the overlap, =_= and closed eyes are different styles; an implication would just clutter the latter.

Both tags have kind of dinstinct purposes imho, so -1 from me.
You can also argue it's actually closer to squinting (then again, different purposes, and squinting -closed_eyes would be annoying).

e:f;b etc.

As others said, squinting is not quite closed so we can't do this one.