Nonsexual presenting?

The bulk update request #58406 (forum #435725) has been approved by @nonamethanks.

The bulk update request #58237 (forum #435092) has been approved by @nonamethanks.

BUR #58568 is pending approval.

create alias presenting_armpit -> presenting_own_armpit
remove alias presenting_armpit -> presenting_own_armpit
create alias presenting_foot -> presenting_own_foot
remove alias presenting_foot -> presenting_own_foot
create alias presenting_pussy -> presenting_own_pussy
remove alias presenting_pussy -> presenting_own_pussy
create alias presenting_breasts -> presenting_own_breasts
remove alias presenting_breasts -> presenting_own_breasts
create alias presenting_anus -> presenting_own_anus
remove alias presenting_anus -> presenting_own_anus

These are the major tags that will need to be split.

There's a bunch of others that seem like padding tags, or extremely underpopulated:

presenting_tanlines
presenting_penis
presenting_stomach
presenting_legs
presenting_pectorals
presenting_sideboob
presenting_nipples
presenting_swimsuit
presenting_sidepec
presenting_hand
presenting_chest
presenting_navel
presenting_shibari
presenting_kneepit

LQ said in forum #435510:

BUR #58347 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create alias presenting_another -> presenting_another's_body
remove alias presenting_another -> presenting_another's_body

For less ambiguity and more consistency with other tags. There's a handful of cutesy nonsexual presenting another posts where an entire character is being presented ("look at my friend!", "look at my pet!", "are you seeing this shit?")

presenting another (rating:general)

presenting another (rating:sensitive)

anything under will smith: tada (meme) really

This also makes it clearer you can combine presenting_own_body and presenting_another's_body with the existing tags like presenting_ass (as we don't need to rename these to presenting_own_ass and presenting_another's_ass).

guys i found a problem

also presenting_own_body rating:g has some interesting posts as well

Though that's the same pose and she's saying "Ta-da!", I would just untag presenting own body and tag that with posing as she is not actually clearly presenting anything.

LQ said in forum #436484:

Though that's the same pose and she's saying "Ta-da!", I would just untag presenting own body and tag that with posing as she is not actually clearly presenting anything.

In my opinion, the post seems fit for presenting now that the sexual implications of the tag are gone. She's blatantly looks like she's presenting something.

Or, is presenting being shelved altogether for being too vague?

StarfishAtLarge said in forum #436487:

In my opinion, the post seems fit for presenting now that the sexual implications of the tag are gone. She's blatantly looks like she's presenting something.

Or, is presenting being shelved altogether for being too vague?

it has to be shelved because most users who have been using the presenting tag for sexual stuff won't use the presenting own body tag if the presenting tag still exists

trapster77 said in forum #436489:

it has to be shelved because most users who have been using the presenting tag for sexual stuff won't use the presenting own body tag if the presenting tag still exists

Makes sense, I suppose. Still a shame that in order to solve the problem of presenting having too small a scope, its scope has been reduced to zero.