Tag Implication: back_hug -> hug

Implicating back_hug -> hug.

Reason: Type of hug. Is pillow_hug one, also?

Hug refers to a 'person' in its wiki. So at the moment, at least, pillow hug doesn't fit into it... Although I notice a few images of people hugging stuffed animals in hug, so maybe we should just change the wiki.

Is there a special tag for someone who is hugging a stuffed animal, by the way?

back_hug done.

As for pillow_hug, maybe not? Depends if we want hug to be or hugging other people. I see leg_hug doesn't implicate hug (yet), for example.

How do people want to handle this?

Edit: beaten, but still open to comments.

I'd suggest aliasing all of the *_hug tags to *_hugging, and implicating hugging on each of them. That seems more in line with the current verb-tagging scheme to me.

Aliasing hug to hugging seems similar to the situation with kiss to kissing in forum #29624. It's hard to explain at the moment, but "hugging" doesn't sit well with me.

Hillside_Moose said:
Aliasing hug to hugging seems similar to the situation with kiss to kissing in forum #29624. It's hard to explain at the moment, but "hugging" doesn't sit well with me.

It's probably because they're used as nouns often, e.g. "give me a hug/kiss."

We'd tag burping, because we can't readily illustrate a burp itself, but hug, because it's easy to draw arms around something.

...right?