post #7760459An an other one.
Updated by ion288
Posted under General
Reapproved after being flagged. "Artist" is known maker of AI pics and several that had been uploaded had been deleted from here.
Updated by MaskedAvenger
This post #7821568 was tagged ai-generated by mk103781220
I've looked further into mk103781220 Pixiv account to find that some posts from the artists art's art style has not been consistent.
And if mk103781220 does use ai-assisted or generated art. I'd like an ai generated/assisted check request on post #7806218 which was made by the same artist.
Sorry, but would someone mind taking a look at post #7825962 ? It has a lot of strange lines and coloring inconsistencies that don't seem to be present on the artist's Pixiv uploads.
I believe post #7724734 is AI-generated. Lots of bad outlines in the picture, and the good ones look irregular. Colors look simple. The blurred parts of the pic are also irregular. And the resolution is 1024x1024, typical of this kind of pics.
Marlor said:
Some of their recent artworks (1 character with simple background, likes post #7812485 post #7812493 post #7812503 post #7812781) appear quite different if you compare them to their other posts, especially the shading and noise. I think there is some chance that these may be AI-assisted for rendering
Marlor said:
is it!?
Qeemo said:
is it!?
It is, and some other latest posts like post #7812485 post #7812493 post #7812503 post #7805930
Eurekaaaaaa said:
Some of their recent artworks (1 character with simple background, likes post #7812485 post #7812493 post #7812503 post #7812781) appear quite different if you compare them to their other posts, especially the shading and noise. I think there is some chance that these may be AI-assisted for rendering
Yes.
Marlor said:
It is, and some other latest posts like post #7812485 post #7812493 post #7812503 post #7805930
Yes.
Which exact parts of those posts make you think they're ai-generated? Because you can see the brush strokes and the copypaste of certain details that clearly shows they were at the very least extensively edited by hand.
Marlor said:
It is, and some other latest posts like post #7812485 post #7812493 post #7812503 post #7805930
Yes.
I don't think it's ai-generated though, but still possibly ai-assisted for shading to some degree on some of them, like post #7812503 being the most obvious for me
nonamethanks said:
Which exact parts of those posts make you think they're ai-generated? Because you can see the brush strokes and the copypaste of certain details that clearly shows they were at the very least extensively edited by hand.
Typical screaming AI shading. post #7805930 - there's even some strange artifacted line on the left border.
Overall strange artifacts everywhere which yet again you can see by playing with contrast filters - here are some examples https://imgur.com/a/cbnvit4
Marlor said:
Typical screaming AI shading. post #7805930 - there's even some strange artifacted line on the left border.
Overall strange artifacts everywhere which yet again you can see by playing with contrast filters - here are some examples https://imgur.com/a/cbnvit4
Here's his old work with exact the same filter https://imgur.com/a/JXAWU19 - nothing like with AI gend pictures above.
I think yes, but just to make sure...
Knowledge_Seeker said:
I think yes, but just to make sure...
Yeah, billions of artifacts again
nonamethanks said:
Which exact parts of those posts make you think they're ai-generated? Because you can see the brush strokes and the copypaste of certain details that clearly shows they were at the very least extensively edited by hand.
To me, the thick lineart is is reminiscent of a lot of ai-assisted works coming out lately. Coupled with how this isn't present on older posts, plus the usual shading, makes me pretty certain it's assisted, but not more.
Yet another self-upload AI slop. I guess some approver just blindly clicking on it without checking the source.
TrueKringe said:
Yet another self-upload AI slop. I guess some approver just blindly clicking on it without checking the source.
Mistakes happen, no need to get snarky at approvers. There's way too many posts to thoroughly check everything, mistakes silp through, that's what flagging is for.