Posted under General
Grahf said:
I'm not sure if there's any definitive proof, but a lot of the more recent stuff that flowerxl has put out really seems like AI gen, to the point where I'd be kind of shocked if it weren't. The latest image especially, post #7002353 which has mismatched patterns on the bra design, and the thumb on her left hand is pretty janky.
It 100% looks like it based on the faces and rendering too it's totally different and has a generic ai look
Grahf said:
I'm not sure if there's any definitive proof, but a lot of the more recent stuff that flowerxl has put out really seems like AI gen, to the point where I'd be kind of shocked if it weren't. The latest image especially, post #7002353 which has mismatched patterns on the bra design, and the thumb on her left hand is pretty janky.
By comparing post #6296323 and the alt post #6315743
-Totally different tits and shoulders size
-Legs positions Slightly changed
-Slightly hair changed around the body
The only reason for this is because it's inpainting. If they did draw it, all they have to do is hide the outfit layers not completely redraw the whole thing
Updated by Eurekaaaaaa
In light of more evidence, what should be done? I don't think all of their work is AI gen. If there was a point were I think they started to use it, it would be around post #6144812 or maybe slightly later?
Eurekaaaaaa said:
By comparing post #6296323 and the alt post #6315743
-Totally different tits and shoulders size
-Legs positions Slightly changed
-Slightly hair changed around the bodyThe only reason for this is because it's inpainting. If they did draw it, all they have to do is hide the outfit layers not completely redraw the whole thing
Though if you look at the Tifa or Bea posts of them, they did exactly that. If it was AI, surely the same mistakes would have been made, no?
So far I would say there is evidence that AI-assistance might be involved in some of their latest work but I wouldn't call them fully AI-generated for now.
123kid said:
Though if you look at the Tifa or Bea posts of them, they did exactly that. If it was AI, surely the same mistakes would have been made, no?
So far I would say there is evidence that AI-assistance might be involved in some of their latest work but I wouldn't call them fully AI-generated for now.
The Bea one is from 2022 so, of course it's hand-drawn.
I'm not sure which Tifa one you mean, but the recent ones ( post #6375881 , post #6379349 ) also got signs of inpainting
-Groin position changed
-Cleavage and her left-armpit position changed
Is this artwork post #6992705 ai-generated ?
At first glance I'm not able to tell, so I don't want to try appealing a submission that's not allowed here.
post #6994255
Is this surely AI generated? Please add a tag if it is.
Posts cannot be ai-generated and ai-assisted simultaneously. I presume these two are ai-assisted (as that's what the rest of this set, and many of the works by this artist are tagged with), but I could not remove the ai-generated tag here. What's the situation on that then?
Maiden_in_Orange said:
Posts cannot be ai-generated and ai-assisted simultaneously. I presume these two are ai-assisted (as that's what the rest of this set, and many of the works by this artist are tagged with), but I could not remove the ai-generated tag here. What's the situation on that then?
They get auto-tagged ai-generated because of the PNG:Parameters metadata field (you can click the » next to the size to see the media asset page, then scroll down the right-side panel). Whether they're assisted or not I do not know, but they still have the output metadata from the AI generation process.
Maiden_in_Orange said:
Posts cannot be ai-generated and ai-assisted simultaneously. I presume these two are ai-assisted (as that's what the rest of this set, and many of the works by this artist are tagged with), but I could not remove the ai-generated tag here. What's the situation on that then?
Those are definitely AI generated and not assisted, since even the owner of the Pixiv account in the original source confesses in the description they're pausing their activities due to the closure of the AI category in Fantia. The image in the source has also the AI-generated tag too; definitely the uploader and aprover knew it. At least the owner of the account is honest about their AI-generated work and doesn't attempt to lie or put obstacles in the search of information about them like others in this thread.
duosix_setsu0408
They had a shift in artstyle in the middle of the year and have been putting out Shirakami Fubuki and Kawakaze illustrations en masse, which makes me think AI is involved.
Sessyoin_Kiara said:
duosix_setsu0408
They had a shift in artstyle in the middle of the year and have been putting out Shirakami Fubuki and Kawakaze illustrations en masse, which makes me think AI is involved.
Definitely. The artist it's been active in Pixiv since 2021; back then his drawings were clearly made by a novice, and he was showing a natural grown, for example, here and here. These two images have two years of diference, and as I said, the artist was having a normal development in his abilities. However, he's suddenly posting things like this, or this. If you pay attention, the tweets I've attatched have only two days of difference, and were posted in November of this year. In months, he reached the progress he couldn't in two years, and also he's posting too quickly for human standards.
This is the case of a beginner artist who gave in and is starting to use AI in his illustrations. The most recent upload under his artist tag, post #7019545 has various inconsistencies; those inconsistencies are present in the rest of his most recent images (From August to the present month of this already ending year), which leads me to believe he's using the same AI software and the same promps to mass generate his images.
Can anyone confirm whether or not unstableboiler uses AI? Their name is a bit suspicious by itself, but a lot of their stuff has traditional AI flaws and is tagged as such.
But some guy keeps removing the AI-assisted tag from posts:
https://danbooru.donmai.us/post_versions?search%5Bpost_id%5D=6370462
https://danbooru.donmai.us/post_versions?search%5Bpost_id%5D=6521764
https://danbooru.donmai.us/post_versions?search%5Bpost_id%5D=7020155
wavedash said:
Can anyone confirm whether or not unstableboiler uses AI? Their name is a bit suspicious by itself, but a lot of their stuff has traditional AI flaws and is tagged as such.
But some guy keeps removing the AI-assisted tag from posts:
https://danbooru.donmai.us/post_versions?search%5Bpost_id%5D=6370462
https://danbooru.donmai.us/post_versions?search%5Bpost_id%5D=6521764
https://danbooru.donmai.us/post_versions?search%5Bpost_id%5D=7020155
Could you elaborate what was AI about those images?
wavedash said:
Can anyone confirm whether or not unstableboiler uses AI? Their name is a bit suspicious by itself, but a lot of their stuff has traditional AI flaws and is tagged as such.
But some guy keeps removing the AI-assisted tag from posts:
https://danbooru.donmai.us/post_versions?search%5Bpost_id%5D=6370462
https://danbooru.donmai.us/post_versions?search%5Bpost_id%5D=6521764
https://danbooru.donmai.us/post_versions?search%5Bpost_id%5D=7020155
Okay, I found some WIPs in the Twitter of this artist, and I'm attatching them, here and here (Worth to say, the last one isn't a WIP per se, but a sketch as a result of an art raffle, in the words of the artist himself.) The result of the first WIP is here. Somebody in this thread told me AI-art generators are capable of creating WIPs; I recognize I'm bad identifying WIPs done by an AI, so if you can help me with these, we could determinate if he's using AI or not. In case this isn't enough to determinate it, I'm going to dig deeper and seek for more evidence.
from 9 months ago
Infantramen said:
Could you elaborate what was AI about those images?
Here we go again, I wonder why you are always so damn fast when someone has a discussion about unstableboiler ?
forum #237035
forum #237050
forum #237057
forum #237061
forum #237109
forum #237203
forum #237210
forum #237213
SlaughteredMelon said:
Okay, I found some WIPs in the Twitter of this artist, and I'm attatching them, here and here (Worth to say, the last one isn't a WIP per se, but a sketch as a result of an art raffle, in the words of the artist himself.) The result of the first WIP is here. Somebody in this thread told me AI-art generators are capable of creating WIPs; I recognize I'm bad identifying WIPs done by an AI, so if you can help me with these, we could determinate if he's using AI or not. In case this isn't enough to determinate it, I'm going to dig deeper and seek for more evidence.
That seems to be a legit WIP done by a human, but I still think most of unstableboiler's work could have been AI-assisted, especially the background (post #6970249 post #6521764 post #5869021)
Updated by Eurekaaaaaa
Eurekaaaaaa said:
from 9 months ago
Here we go again, I wonder why you are always so damn fast when someone has a discussion about unstableboiler ?
forum #237035
forum #237050
forum #237057
forum #237061
forum #237109
forum #237203
forum #237210
forum #237213
Im always here if it wasnt clear from my previous posts. Im not breaking any rules in doing so. I think my question was fair to ask. Blindly tagging stuff as AI doesnt seem fair to me. At least post a reason why
wavedash said:
Can anyone confirm whether or not unstableboiler uses AI? Their name is a bit suspicious by itself, but a lot of their stuff has traditional AI flaws and is tagged as such.
But some guy keeps removing the AI-assisted tag from posts:
https://danbooru.donmai.us/post_versions?search%5Bpost_id%5D=6370462
https://danbooru.donmai.us/post_versions?search%5Bpost_id%5D=6521764
https://danbooru.donmai.us/post_versions?search%5Bpost_id%5D=7020155
Pretty good AI-redrawer. Sad that he doesn't redraw ai background and just upscale it.
