AI-generated art check thread

Shiocchi said:

This might not be the correct thread for this, but everything in juejue's tag is AI generated, and are tagged as such on Pixiv. I don't want to have to flag each individual one, so can someone delete them all?

Although those tags were not added by the artist themselves, if you actually look at any of their art there is clear AI editing going on, especially in the hands. You can basically pick them out at random and spot it in every image after post #6088792. Like, it's an extremely obvious artstyle shift.

I'm going to tag most of them AI-assisted because they're obviously also edited. I don't know if this is in that grey area of "not edited enough" or whatever, but not tagging it at least assisted would be obviously incorrect. Especially for the nude ones. The ones with clothes seems to be edited even more or not even AI at all.

This artist Lepypepy has been in some drama on Twitter about suspicions of tracing AI art. Huge sus on them.

Marlor said:

It is, and yet again, you can easily check it by opening photoshop or another editing program and playing with the contrast settings. It'll show you tons of noises, which would never be there if it were a real painting.
See this example: forum #241342

https://files.catbox.moe/e88oso.png

The result is completely different from this one. At high contrast and steep curves, besides the polka dots, I see a fine grain, which is more like a filter, plus color banding due to low bit depth. If no noise is shown after this much manipulation I don't think there is any noise in this. Unless you were referring to JPEG artefacts which would not be present if you downloaded the full-size image to edit.

PSD: https://files.catbox.moe/z7gff2.psd

BTW, as a control group, I applied exactly the same Adjustment Masks to the picture used in forum #241342. This is the result and you can see it does reveal the noise and patterns.

https://files.catbox.moe/uvh3ub.png
https://files.catbox.moe/2fqfxe.psd

anon2anon2 said:

This artist Lepypepy has been in some drama on Twitter about suspicions of tracing AI art. Huge sus on them.

Tracing other people's work and tracing AI are two different accusations, so I'll just say that post #6757470 seems traced over post #1430291, and that the framing of post #6658765 looks a bit like what AI would produce.

post #6813115
I'm not convinced this is humanly drawn; just scattered weird imperfections.

ToxicOrochi said:

post #6813115
I'm not convinced this is humanly drawn; just scattered weird imperfections.

AI is afoot: hair merging into bow, garbled wrist cuffs, garbled eyes, improperly rendered jewelry, hair folding over eyelid. Also, the watermark belongs to an AI art site, which I noticed way too late.

ToxicOrochi said:

post #6813115
I'm not convinced this is humanly drawn; just scattered weird imperfections.

It's not. Nonsense aside, just look at that "SoulGen" logo in the upper corner. One search, and yep, AI "art" generator.

Protip: People this blatant about upping AI are almost always also poorly tagged, unsourced messes, I've found. And yet somehow, people still keep trying.

Edit: Ninja'd.

8253803 said:

https://files.catbox.moe/e88oso.png

The result is completely different from this one. At high contrast and steep curves, besides the polka dots, I see a fine grain, which is more like a filter, plus color banding due to low bit depth. If no noise is shown after this much manipulation I don't think there is any noise in this. Unless you were referring to JPEG artefacts which would not be present if you downloaded the full-size image to edit.

PSD: https://files.catbox.moe/z7gff2.psd

BTW, as a control group, I applied exactly the same Adjustment Masks to the picture used in forum #241342. This is the result and you can see it does reveal the noise and patterns.

https://files.catbox.moe/uvh3ub.png
https://files.catbox.moe/2fqfxe.psd

Look at the hair, there're exact the same noises

Marlor said:

Look at the hair, there're exact the same noises

I see some odd noise in the hair, but it is a small portion of the whole image. Maybe it's ai-assisted and mostly painted over, as everywhere else looks like human painted.

post #6596075
Flag but no tag.

mafunyo - not-yet-posted works on fantia look sus

post #6816718

Marlor said:

post #6816718

Illuminarty has that listed as 69.9% chance of being AI, if that's a factor to be considered.

argentb said:

Illuminarty has that listed as 69.9% chance of being AI, if that's a factor to be considered.

It's really not, those tools are notoriously unreliable.

post #6727290

post #6830251

Looks suspicious at the first glance, not helping that artist's other works were tagged with AI related tags.

VR-Man said:

post #6830251

Looks suspicious at the first glance, not helping that artist's other works were tagged with AI related tags.

Why not? Definitely AI gend.

https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/107728105
https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/107728070
Can anyone check these for me before I submit them, please?

flashheart said:

https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/107728105
https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/107728070
Can anyone check these for me before I submit them, please?

Seems 100% ok to me

https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/107689283

Good consistency of art on their pixiv, but this piece is triggering some of my AI flags in terms of color and composition

Edit: and another one:

https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/107072442