It could still be traced from AI generated images :shrug:
Posted under General
Mayhem-Chan said:
You can't tell me that those, especially the first two, look like anything other than half-assed/braindead paint-over AI, there's a limit to what "hands are hard" can explain, and no human genuinely draws them like that
In their draft, they had much clearer depictions of what the hands were doing. Yes hands are hard and the artist completely lost their clue when coloring.
https://files.catbox.moe/1re4hv.jpeg
https://files.catbox.moe/jbcam7.jpeg
If they traced from any existing image, why would they actively change the contours?
And in this one below, if they traced "braindeadly", why took so many steps back and forth on the arms and sleeves, why was her hair not interrupting her bra's or arm's contour? Speaking of, the hair loop is a design feature.
https://files.catbox.moe/b3cfcx.gif
Lastly, why was it even necessary for them to "generatively" or "iteratively" get the shadings right and also make minor adjustments to the contours in the meantime, if they could just trace from an AI image?
post #6631597
although i reckon it deserves ai-assited tag, i'm not sure as no evidence the aritst used any generated stuff on their pixiv. what do you think?
i reckon because i suppose it's traced an ai generated image as it's got the "face", some weird hair flow (seen like just near her left shoulder), missing fingers, messed lace for her left shoe, missing shoe lace ends for her right shoe.
some of those features would also apply for the other images of the artist.
miyaco said:
post #6631597
although i reckon it deserves ai-assited tag, i'm not sure as no evidence the aritst used any generated stuff on their pixiv. what do you think?i reckon because i suppose it's traced an ai generated image as it's got the "face", some weird hair flow (seen like just near her left shoulder), missing fingers, messed lace for her left shoe, missing shoe lace ends for her right shoe.
some of those features would also apply for the other images of the artist.
ai-assisted is the appropriate tag. vector_trace might also apply. Would wait for a third opinion though.
Updated by 8253803
8253803 said:
ai-assisted is the appropriate tag. vector_trace might also apply. Would wait for a third opinion though.
thanks for your opinion! i couldn't come up with vector_trace, but you'd be right.
i'd also wait for some more opinions before adding the tags.
Flowerxl is definitely using ai, compare it to his old art before ai became popularized/ available
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts?tags=flowerxl&z=1
All the images in recent months have the generic washed out gaussian blur/ airbrushed ai face especially
There's a strange full-image filter applied which produces a ghosting effect; its most noticeable by her right shoulder, earring, and the stem of the wine glass. For some reason the filter was applied after they added their twitter username, as it is affected as well. The filter introduces obvious artifacts which obfuscates the issue of whether the image was AI-generated, which may or may not have been the intent. The filter may be there to suggest the viewer has been drugged.
That said, the view through the empty part of the wine glass is inconsistent with what is behind it, and her ear is discolored, smudged and muddy, as is her collarbone.
Lots of random artifacts on that one, but this speedpaint by the artist looks manmade. It also has a bit where the artist brings in a new strand of hair and starts resizing it, naturally creating some artifacts in the final image.
Actually, it looks bizarrely like the artist is reusing elements of post #6281906 or something.
post #6669504
Curious about this and the two deleted posts under this artist, maybe AI-assisted rather than full AI?
Definitely at least AI-assisted, just look at how her arm looks through the wine glass. It shows her skin color even though it should show her red sweater.
I think preview_(preview0) has been using AI lately.
Paid rewards have multiple hints of an image being upscaled (aliasing, halos around contours, blocky texture despite being PNGs) and painted over in some places, it looks ai-assisted to me.
Her left armpit looks like a pair of breasts
704573r said:
Her left armpit looks like a pair of breasts
Or just look at the crudely painted over area on the right side of her waist.
feline_lump said:
Errors and badly drawn details are not the same thing as AI.
In case that was referring to my comment, what I was talking about looked like someone who can’t draw crudely painted over something in the image, which seems pretty common with non-artists trying to fix something in AI art.
kittey said:
In case that was referring to my comment, what I was talking about looked like someone who can’t draw crudely painted over something in the image, which seems pretty common with non-artists trying to fix something in AI art.
Brush strokes are visible in the rest of the image, and it's already been shown above that the artist can draw by hand (another more obvious example here). There are various signs of AI artists that can overlap with signs of artists cutting corners to post on Twitter every week.
post #6677174 and the others by this artist.
Seems like some people are suspicious.
ion288 said:
post #6677174 and the others by this artist.
Seems like some people are suspicious.
All AI.
Part of her hair on the right, and overall shading and body shape.
EDIT:
A lot of their recent works seem suspicious.
