AI-generated art check thread

Posted under General

Alabel

nyom said:

If it's about post #10475517, I'll just go ahead and say that I'm not at all convinced that this artist with years of experience dating to way before AI was a thing, with old works already looking very skillfully made, used AI here. Nothing in that posts stands out as particularly suspicious to me.

I understand your point. I would like, however, to point to the lace trimming alone, veil and clothes, beside the part on her head turns into an utter incomprehensible mess, at one point being detached from the veil. Several bats look like random shapes that don't remind me of anything alive. And at least the jewellery in her braid lacks any uniformity, with rightmost being disfigured.
Edit: on even closer look even the lace on her head seems to be made of parts that get in on each other.

It may not be fully AI, but to some degree it is. And although I generally use the artist's activity as an indicator, in cases as these I cannot disregard the possibility that they decided to use AI to some degree.

Reply
trainingslip6

nyom said:

If it's about post #10475517, I'll just go ahead and say that I'm not at all convinced that this artist with years of experience dating to way before AI was a thing, with old works already looking very skillfully made, used AI here. Nothing in that posts stands out as particularly suspicious to me.

Given the history I also severely doubt it's AI, but to me the bats morphing into sloppy squiggles and the braids seeming to blend into the background at points definitely are... interesting stylistic choices. That could be explained by how the original twitter source post calls it unfinished, though.

The moon in the background is also a pretty close match for the real-life moon of Earth, which to me is a point in the "not AI" column.

Reply
user 1434626

Lace is hard to draw. If it was a lace pattern I’d understand where you’re coming from, but drawing lace trim without a specific digital pen is hard. The original post did call it a work in progress as well. Why are you so set on this specific drawing being AI? The burnt clothing at the bottom of the image is too specific to be generated

Reply
Alabel

czernin said:

Lace is hard to draw. If it was a lace pattern I’d understand where you’re coming from, but drawing lace trim without a specific digital pen is hard. The original post did call it a work in progress as well. Why are you so set on this specific drawing being AI? The burnt clothing at the bottom of the image is too specific to be generated

Part of it is because I'm still learning on how to tell AI. And I do understand that the lace trim is one hell of a task. However, the trimming directly to our right of her head makes not a lick of sense - no basic pattern, detached piece from the veil, a line ending on nothing - these I often found in information on how to detect if AI was involved. Among the bats, the one directly to our left from her head just deteriorated heavily compared to the ones surrounding her.

I will concede that much of the drawing beside the elements I already mentioned does feel like drawn by human and I apologize for initially assuming the whole thing was AI.

Reply
Alabel

Confetto said:

ir0937th

Can't say I don't agree with the commenter on post #10478972, the anatomy sure is something alright. And what's with the strange artifact by her left hair bow?

Feels more like she has a set of six breasts unless the top ones just learned how to suck into themselves.

Looking at their pixiv there sure is quite a bit of weird stuff going on.

Reply
Placeholder1996

VR-Man said:

imo salad (yuuly 2023)

The first time I saw post #10476995, I got suspicious, not to mention its 1024x1024 resolution, which according to ai-generated wiki is a common AI resolution.

Their Twitter account also has a lot more AI-looking arts posted almost everyday (sometimes twice a day).

I'm confident this is a prompter. Melty lines on the bikini in post #10476995 (asset #40017469, asset #40017472), and on the left hand in post #10093678.

Reply
Snoozing

Missingno2024 said:

No need, it will go unapproved in three days. You don't want a manual deletion on that, it costs 5 slots for 3 days in that case.

Fair fair, that works for me
Thanks

Reply
wavedash

AI-assisted self-poster?
post #9500639
Bikini frills look bad, bikini tie looks bad, jacket buttons look bad and kind of bleed into other lines, asymmetrical and weird designs on the sandals, bangs are overall very weird
post #9643383
Eyelashes doing weird stuff, hair is overall pretty bad (see the area to the right of cheek)
post #10488637
Christmas trees look bad, guy's pubic hair bleeding into the background, shiver squiggles look bad, eyebrows intersecting with hair lines weird, garter strap's clip looks bad, the holes in her thighhighs and gloves look weird, strand of hair overlapping her collar looks weird (and why is there a collar in the first place, when her shirt is pulled down)

Reply
Placeholder1996

czernin said:

Educastro is definitely using AI... Those trees in the last one are artifacted like crazy, along with guy's penis. Seems like they were rushing to get this out before Christmas. Also look at her right eye lol

Agreed. I flagged it, too many artifacts in my opinion. post #9500639 seems suspicious as well; the buttons on the jacket, the tie on the bikini top, and the eyes in particular. Edit, I see wavedash was talking about this too, going to flag the rest.

Updated by Placeholder1996

Reply
Meowscar64

can we please stop with the AI derangement syndrome? someone has flagged two images I uploaded as AI frivolously, especially considering the artist tags his own stuff as assisted, generated, or not, and in one particular case ( post #10216702 ) he posted a WIP of the image and talked about not polishing at much as others. Before or in the day of the release of ZA too, when no loras and stuff prompters use existed to adapt that character into their dataset.

I already know its going to ruin my upload ratio despite working hard to make more slots and was careful with my uploads so is tagging "AI-assisted" just not good enough? I am looking at the pictures in question ( post #10488360 ) they looks consistent, no abomination, no burn out. Consistent patterns, non-uniform freckles, even some lines without aliasing which good luck generating

Reply
oppaimaxxing

VR-Man said:

artllatar

Just want to make sure, is this guy using AI? Because not all of them were tagged ai-generated (and few of them even removed by someone else). I added it back, but figured maybe I should be asking here too.

definitely seems to be using ai, especially judging by some unposted works that are on his twitter
(caution: nudity and lewd works)
the eye shines here are odd
hair accessories, eyes, ears
hat symbol, bridle pattern, belt, nipples

Reply
1 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 237