gsoares said:
post #5355475
"Extreme fetish content"
Bonked them.
Posted under General
This topic has been locked.
gsoares said:
post #5355475
"Extreme fetish content"
Bonked them.
nonamethanks said:
I DM'd the flagger about flag reasons, but that said:
I get that we've recently descended into caveman-tier dialectics for flag reasons, and I find it pretty annoying that "quality check" is basically equivalent with leaving the reason empty, and I really don't want to encourage this kind of behaviour, and I've considered submitting a pull request to allow admins to deny flags as invalid via danboorubot to discourage it, and all that, but frankly I don't think Lilo & Stitch toon porn is a hill worth dying on regarding flag reasons. I think this is one of those cases where it's obvious and undeniable why the post was flagged.
And what about this?
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts?tags=amania_orz+status%3Aflagged&z=5
I am sure the only reason why the flagger didn't flag more with the same "caveman-tier dialet" reason is cuz they run out of uploads slots.
RIGperu said:
And what about this?
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts?tags=amania_orz+status%3Aflagged&z=5
I am sure the only reason why the flagger didn't flag more with the same "caveman-tier dialet" reason is cuz they run out of uploads slots.
Thankfully, flags don't use upload slots. They use a different limit not displayed.
Please stop assuming every flag you disagree with is done out of malice. To be honest, a few of those I might've flagged myself. If someone is flagging maliciously, it tends to be unbelievably obvious.
This... is not obvious. A few images from a single artist and three different uploaders? That's almost certainly not malicious.
Veradux said:
Thankfully, flags don't use upload slots. They use a different limit not displayed.
Please stop assuming every flag you disagree with is done out of malice. To be honest, a few of those I might've flagged myself. If someone is flagging maliciously, it tends to be unbelievably obvious.
This... is not obvious. A few images from a single artist and three different uploaders? That's almost certainly not malicious.
I was referring to the flag reason "quality check" which is the same than adding "no reason".
Updated by user 454355
Flagged for off-topic, but if someone thinks that's off-topic they need to be hit on the head.
"copyright content"
post #162805 flagged for being a duplicate. It's not even a duplicate.
post #5473059
Duplicate is not a valid flag reason.
ion288 said:
post #5473059
Duplicate is not a valid flag reason.
The flag reason given is "inferior duplicate", though, which is.
skylightcrystal said:
The flag reason given is "inferior duplicate", though, which is.
Doesn't change that "duplicate" is an invalid flag reason, even if it's an inferior duplicate. See howto:flag.
It's even explicitly stated in howto:flag to not flag duplicates.
Talulah said:
It's even explicitly stated in howto:flag to not flag duplicates.
I always read that as a "don't flag what we would now call pixel-perfect duplicates". A picture being an objectively inferior version of another already existing one has a long history of being an accepted flag reason.
For the record, it was not me who flagged this image.
skylightcrystal said:
A picture being an objectively inferior version of another already existing one has a long history of being an accepted flag reason.
This changed quite a while ago. And if only pixel-perfect dupes were disallowed to flag, it would be seen in the window when you want to flag an image and not duplicate.
Agree with skylightcrystal. There's no point uploading a lower quality/lower resolution version of the exact same art that already existed on danbooru. Maybe the user's mistake was not seeing the "Similar Posts" note when uploading it. I doubt it would even be approved if it was in the qeue.
post #4068470
"Single page of a comic"
Pretty sure single-page comics are allowed.
What's with the weird comic flag reasons lately?