Implicating gundam_wing_endless_waltz to gundam_wing.
Reason: Direct sequel to Wing and has several reoccurring characters from Wing.
Updated by a moderator
Posted under General
jxh2154 said:
And only 4 posts. I know there was the little girl, but is there any other reason why it'd be problematic to just tag them gundam_wing and leave it at that? Is the GWEW tag needed?
With the total amount of Wing posts? I suppose not. There are about eight or so additional posts I could have tagged as EW but didn't get around to doing so. The posts that feature the iconic WZC gundam make up the bulk of any potential EW posts.
While on the subject of tag implications and gundam, would it be possible to fix the tag implication gundam_seed_c.e._73:_stargazer to gundam_seed? This was proposed way back in forum #11380 it was actually done. However, the name of the series was changed from gundam_seed_c.e._73_stargazer to gundam_seed_c.e._73:_stargazer and the implication was lost.
reese said:
With the total amount of Wing posts? I suppose not. There are about eight or so additional posts I could have tagged as EW but didn't get around to doing so. The posts that feature the iconic WZC gundam make up the bulk of any potential EW posts.
After going through the gundam_wing posts and tagging what could be EW, the result is that 17/70 wing posts are EW and as I predicted earlier, most of the EW posts are of WZC. Like Fencedude said it isn't an overly important distinction and tagging certain posts as wing_zero_custom_gundam instead of wing_gundam_zero would probably suffice as a distinction.